Hello, All.
I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
Local repo size:
Git: 34M
SVN: 598M
WTF? 598MB and there is no local history?
Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/
$ cd trunk
$ du -sh
84M
Much better, but:
- no history
- no light branches
- no my
On 17/01/11 at 13:53 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
> Hello, All.
>
> I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
>
> Local repo size:
> Git: 34M
> SVN: 598M
>
> WTF? 598MB and there is no local history?
>
> Ok. I checked out topmost directory. Lets check trunk/
> $ cd trunk
>
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Antono Vasiljev
wrote:
>
> Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN?
>
> So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git.
>
> Its my '+1' for git for pkg-ruby-extras.
I'm +1 for Git. We use it at Opscode for all our softwar
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
wrote:
> svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
>
> That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
> svn-bp.
Would it really be a big deal to change the workflow to use git-buildpackage?
I don't even use git-buildpackage fo
On 17/01/11 at 10:09 -0700, Joshua Timberman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Lucas Nussbaum
> wrote:
> > svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
> >
> > That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
> > svn-bp.
>
> Would it really be a big deal to change the wor
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011:
> > > svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
> > > That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
> > > svn-bp.
> > Ok. Let's think positive. What required in order to replace
> > svn-buildpackage wi
On 17/01/11 at 20:55 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
> Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 20:30:56 +0200 2011:
>
> > > > svn-buildpackage wouldn't work with git.
> > > > That's a -1000 considering that our current workflow deeply relies on
> > > > svn-bp.
> > > Ok. Let's think posi
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 14:12:46 +0200 2011:
> > Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN?
> > So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git.
> > Its my '+1' for git for pkg-ruby-extras.
>
> svn-buildpackage wouldn't work wit
Antono Vasiljev dijo [Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 01:53:55PM +0200]:
> Hello, All.
>
> I cloned svn repo with git-svn and experimented a little bit.
> (...)
>
> Almost every big ruby project use git today. Why should we use SVN?
>
> So. I would like to know your cons/pros about switching to git.
>
> I
Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 21:41:15 +0200 2011:
> > > I think so, yes. All the docs refer to it, the new processes need to be
> > > defined, etc, etc. For what benefit? OK, git is faster, and I prefer git
> > > for new projects too.
> >
> > It's easier to contribute and
On 18/01/11 at 22:05 +0200, Antono Vasiljev wrote:
> Excerpts from Lucas Nussbaum's message of Mon Jan 17 21:41:15 +0200 2011:
>
> > > > I think so, yes. All the docs refer to it, the new processes need to be
> > > > defined, etc, etc. For what benefit? OK, git is faster, and I prefer git
> > > >
11 matches
Mail list logo