On 29.03.2015 05:13, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> It would surely be beneficial if the users arguing for support of this
> feature could document its popularity.
Data point: I use this feature (via my own systemd packages) for all my
Raspberry Pi and similar computers. They don't have enough RAM to store
Ansgar Burchardt [2015-03-30 12:41 +0200]:
> It's also possible to go the other way: have a systemd-{base,minimal}
> package providing the small subset and ship the "full" version in the
> systemd binary package.
Tollef Fog Heen [2015-03-30 13:50 +0200]:
> I'd lean slightly the other way, have a s
On Mar 30, Martin Pitt wrote:
> IMHO, systemd should just ship what you need for booting a minimal
> system, and shouldn't have big dependencies. We currently cripple some
> features (networkd, due to dropping iptables-dev) or not ship them at
> all (importd, journald-remote) as they pull in too
]] Martin Pitt
> Michael Biebl [2015-03-29 4:51 +0200]:
> > pitti was suggesting a systemd-extras package, but I'm not a huge fan of
> > this idea either since it's unclear what would go into this package and
> > what not and it complicates things if we have to move stuff around.
>
> IMHO, syst
Hi,
On 03/30/2015 12:29 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hence the idea of systemd-extras -- everything which brings in large
> dependencies and isn't needed for booting every system can go there.
> systemd would Recommends: systemd-extras, but admins of embedded
> machines etc. could remove/not install i
Michael Biebl [2015-03-29 4:51 +0200]:
> pitti was suggesting a systemd-extras package, but I'm not a huge fan of
> this idea either since it's unclear what would go into this package and
> what not and it complicates things if we have to move stuff around.
IMHO, systemd should just ship what you
Am Sonntag, den 29.03.2015, 04:31 +0200 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> At this time I see no obvious justifications for #4, but still it would
> help if the people interested in enabling this feature could document
> how it is used in practice.
Hi,
although I filed this bug, I don't actually use syste
Am 29.03.2015 um 04:31 schrieb Marco d'Itri:
> Control: forcemerge 742802 771523
>
> On Nov 30, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> This would also mean a library dependency on libmicrohttpd unless we
>> split the package. Both things I'm not particular keen about.
>>
>> We'd first have to evaluate anyway
Control: forcemerge 742802 771523
On Nov 30, Michael Biebl wrote:
> This would also mean a library dependency on libmicrohttpd unless we
> split the package. Both things I'm not particular keen about.
>
> We'd first have to evaluate anyway, how mature this feature is, before
> enabling it.
Post-
