On 2009-04-01 11:48:20, Aaron Seigo wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/scriptengines/javascript/simplejavascriptapplet.h,
line 52
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/496/diff/1/?file=4641#file4641line52
maybe a good opportunity to get rid of the '2' in the name and just
make
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/417/
---
(Updated 2009-04-01 06:08:43.243577)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 01:29:48 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all
just a quick reminding there April 7 is the soft feature freeze for 4.3.
that means that a feature must at least be on the feature plan, and best is
if they are at least started in svn.
If geoclue has too much dependencies for
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Petri Damstén wrote:
On Wednesday 01 April 2009 01:29:48 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all
just a quick reminding there April 7 is the soft feature freeze for 4.3.
that means that a feature must at least be on the feature plan, and best
is if they are at least
Hi,
geolocation dataengine is now in kdereview.
Petri
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel
Hi its me again :P
I updated my proposal based on feedback and it is now nearly
finalized. Main updates include moving widget previewing to
'compulsory milestones' and updating my mockups as Aaron suggested
(including getting rid of the terminal :P).
I have the draft up on the GSoC site as
Hello, my name is Thomas Dziedzic. I am attending UIUC www.uiuc.edu and I am
a sophomore majoring in Computer Science. I'm interested in the following
project:
http://techbase.kde.org/index.php?title=Projects/Summer_of_Code/2009/Ideas#Project:_D-Bus_Interface
I really like this idea because
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, lauri wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to take part of GSoC with Educational layout project.
I have put my revised proposal here:
http://v6sa.itcollege.ee/GSoC/2009/educational_layout.html
i like the project very much, but i wondoer if it could be a problem the fact
that
On Thursday 02 April 2009 11:28:34 you wrote:
Hi Sascha,
awesome and thanks for taking over!
What do you plan to change for 4.3?
I'm only aware of minor annoyances such as opening the configure wallpapers
dialog resetting the zoom and position.
Not much, I think fixing all remaining bugs is
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 2:56 AM, plasma-devel-requ...@kde.org wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2009 18:01:13 -0600
From: Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org
Subject: Re: Summer Of Code [Desktop Dock]
To: plasma-devel@kde.org
Message-ID: 200904011801.17152.ase...@kde.org
Content-Type:
Hi and welcome to plasma and KDE =)
On Thursday 02 April 2009 05:54:31 tdzie...@illinois.edu wrote:
Sorry if this is a little late, but I had tests this week. Anyways I am
working on my proposal and if anyone wants to take a look at it, I'll be
happy to post it up for you, since I'm not done
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
agreed. it's guaranteed to be usable by everyone, even weirdos without
png support ;) , and looks faster. so +1 for that.
to be really portable is enough as is now that assumes argb32 images or an
overcomplication like galago?
assuming 32 bbp
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/368/
---
(Updated 2009-04-02 08:55:49.469863)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/
---
(Updated 2009-04-02 09:33:32.533793)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
On 2009-03-20 14:07:32, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/apps/plasma/applets/folderview/iconview.cpp, line 1208
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/368/diff/2/?file=3392#file3392line1208
A problem with the way this function is implemented is that it assumes
that the view is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/#review785
---
getting closer :)
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
agreed. it's guaranteed to be usable by everyone, even weirdos without
png support ;) , and looks faster. so +1 for that.
to be really portable is enough as is now that assumes argb32 images
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
On Thursday 02 April 2009, Marco Martin wrote:
agreed. it's guaranteed to be usable by everyone, even weirdos
without png support ;) , and looks faster. so +1 for that.
to be really
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/507/
---
Review request for Plasma.
Summary
---
Use the hover background also for
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/507/#review788
---
Ship it!
one very minor change, but then it's good to go!
On 2009-04-02 10:06:27, Aaron Seigo wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/ui/launcher.cpp, line
611
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/diff/5/?file=4680#file4680line611
this should be:
return m_applicationModel-nameDisplayOrder() ==
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/#review790
---
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/ui/launcher.cpp
On 2009-04-02 11:55:26, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/ui/launcher.cpp, lines
596-597
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/diff/5/?file=4680#file4680line596
Maybe we can have a member variable m_showAppsByName which is used
inside
On 2009-04-02 11:55:26, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/ui/launcher.cpp, lines
596-597
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/diff/5/?file=4680#file4680line596
Maybe we can have a member variable m_showAppsByName which is used
inside
On 2009-04-02 10:06:27, Aaron Seigo wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/plasma/applets/kickoff/ui/launcher.cpp, line
611
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/diff/5/?file=4680#file4680line611
this should be:
return m_applicationModel-nameDisplayOrder() ==
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/441/
---
(Updated 2009-04-02 12:34:04.446635)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
On 2009-03-20 14:07:32, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/apps/plasma/applets/folderview/iconview.cpp, line 1208
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/368/diff/2/?file=3392#file3392line1208
A problem with the way this function is implemented is that it assumes
that the view is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/368/
---
(Updated 2009-04-02 13:21:02.238361)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/368/#review796
---
I think in general the code looks good, but there are still numerous
On 2009-03-20 14:07:32, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdebase/apps/plasma/applets/folderview/iconview.cpp, line 1208
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/368/diff/2/?file=3392#file3392line1208
A problem with the way this function is implemented is that it assumes
that the view is
Hi everybody,
based on your feedbaks in the mailing list, I've made some changes in my
proposal.
I think it coul be quite complete now, let me know if I have to be more
detailed, and which subjects improve.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/461/#review800
---
Screenshot:
http://reviewboard.kde.org//r/461/#scomment25
You
Hi !
On Thursday 02 April 2009 15:27:32 agnibha nath wrote:
I have attached futher details and my resume.
You need to fill gsoc's web form and actually propose a project, and not just
send a CV ;)
Check this websites for more information but be aware that the deadline is
tomorrow (3rd of
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/461/
---
(Updated 2009-04-02 17:20:21.771069)
Review request for Plasma and Davide
On 2009-04-02 15:56:56, Davide Bettio wrote:
Screenshot:
http://reviewboard.kde.org
You should move it on top of the list.
And then having the Label, the ListView and the Button spanning two columns?
See the new screenshot.
On 2009-04-02 15:56:56, Davide Bettio wrote:
35 matches
Mail list logo
