Re: activities overview, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 13:09:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On October 12, 2009, Chani wrote: > > > * in a-containment-per-virtual-desktop mode (which i'm starting to feel > > > small amounts of regret over offering ... but maybe i'm just being > > > pessimistic :) the "Choose Activities" would b

Re: Review Request: Kineticscrolling: a zero api approach

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1840/#review2639 --- /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/private/kineticscroll.cpp

Re: activities overview, take N

> > could the kwin devs consider make it a design guideline to not include > panels in such effects but instead leave them untransformed? it just > looks/feels so much more ... nicer. > > the only draw back would be if we ever make panels per-desktop. but then i > guess the heuristic could be

Re: Review Request: Kineticscrolling: a zero api approach

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1840/ --- (Updated 2009-10-13 20:48:15.795082) Review request for Plasma. Changes --

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind > > > activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk > > > integrat

Re: activities overview, take N

On October 13, 2009, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am Dienstag 13 Oktober 2009 20:19:44 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > > On October 13, 2009, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > > both that and modifying kwin to gve it all the necessary atoms to > > > > activate all the needed effects :) > > > > > > Just give us a li

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 19:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind > > activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk > > integration in order to introduce it alongside the new ov

Re: activities overview, take N

Am Dienstag 13 Oktober 2009 20:19:44 schrieb Aaron J. Seigo: > On October 13, 2009, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > > both that and modifying kwin to gve it all the necessary atoms to > > > activate all the needed effects :) > > > > Just give us a list which effects should be activated by a plasmoid and

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

On October 13, 2009 10:17:26 Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind > > activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk > > integration in order to introduce it alongside the new overview

Re: activities overview, take N

On October 13, 2009, Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > both that and modifying kwin to gve it all the necessary atoms to > > activate all the needed effects :) > > Just give us a list which effects should be activated by a plasmoid and we > can add the atoms (which is everything except generic :-P) > >

Re: Review Request: Kineticscrolling: a zero api approach

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1840/#review2634 --- i like the approach; the Animator::registerScrollingManager(QGraphicsW

Re: activities overview, take N

On October 13, 2009 10:41:52 Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > Instead of using atoms we could also extend the dbus interface to have a > really generic interface. Don't know if that's a good idea... > oh. I was assuming kwin effects could already be triggered by dbus... -- This message brought to yo

Re: activities overview, take N

Am Dienstag 13 Oktober 2009 19:31:45 schrieb Marco Martin: > > > a generic "trigger kwin effect" plasmoid should almost be a Junior Job > > > :) > > > > yeah :) > > both that and modifying kwin to gve it all the necessary atoms to activate > all the needed effects :) Just give us a list which eff

Re: activities overview, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On October 12, 2009, Chani wrote: > > > * a "hidden windows" button could be shown in the tasks widget when > > > there are hidden-by-activity-change windows around; switching to one of > > > those windows would switch the activity as well? > > >

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

On October 13, 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind activities, > virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk integration in order > to introduce it alongside the new overview (I guess we'll be able to do it > for 4.5?). i'll be get

Re: activities overview, take N

On October 12, 2009, Chani wrote: > > * a "hidden windows" button could be shown in the tasks widget when there > > are hidden-by-activity-change windows around; switching to one of those > > windows would switch the activity as well? > > I'm not sure. we don't do that for desktops. but because

Re: activities overview, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > On October 13, 2009, Yuen Hoe Lim wrote: > > similar for activities - have an option that says 'Associate new windows > > with the current activity', which, when active, automatically associates > > all windows opened with the activity in which

Re: activities overview, take N

On October 13, 2009, Yuen Hoe Lim wrote: > similar for activities - have an option that says 'Associate new windows > with the current activity', which, when active, automatically associates > all windows opened with the activity in which it is opened? yes, that should be quite possible. -- A

Re: activities overview, take N

On October 13, 2009, Shantanu Tushar Jha wrote: > Well, if we associate windows with a certain activity, I think we're kind > of going to the virtual desktop idea. As I said earlier, this whole > virtual desktop + activity concept seems to confuse people (even more when the problem is that virtu

Re: Review Request: Plasma + Qt Kinetic GSoC Project - Attempt 2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1512/ --- (Updated 2009-10-13 15:06:04.819830) Review request for Plasma, Aaron Seigo, Ale

Re: Review Request: Plasma + Qt Kinetic GSoC Project - Attempt 2

> On 2009-09-21 16:26:17, Aaron Seigo wrote: > > any updates on this? Richard's comments don't seem to be addressed yet. > > Adenilson Cavalcanti wrote: > Aaron is it possible to add my user in the list so I can upload an > updated patch? Current updated patch (addresses most of issues com

Re: Review Request: Plasma + Qt Kinetic GSoC Project - Attempt 2

> On 2009-10-13 09:31:47, Marco Martin wrote: > > /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/animations/fade.cpp, line 45 > > > > > > this unfortunately will be very slow on x11, but i don't see other ways > > to do that? No idea if ther

Review Request: Kineticscrolling: a zero api approach

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1840/ --- Review request for Plasma. Summary --- this is just an experiment that has

Re: Review Request: Plasma + Qt Kinetic GSoC Project - Attempt 2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1512/#review2628 --- /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/animations/animation.h

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > Hi all, > > I've seen the thread about the activities overview. > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind activities, > virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk integration in order > to introduce it alongsid

Re: activities overview, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Chani wrote: > > > > * a "New Activity" tab would appear Active and Stored and would allow > > > > you to create a new activity, including picking what kind of activity > > > > and optionally what other activity you would like to clone > > > > > > interesting. I ended up

Re: Review Request: Fix several kdelibs/plasma issues reported by krazy2 and some compiler warnings

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/1837/#review2626 --- Ship it! yeah, minor nitpickings that i like seeing fixed, good job :

Re: plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

On Tuesday 13 October 2009 11:00:45 Marco Martin wrote: > On Tuesday 13 October 2009, Ivan Čukić wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've seen the thread about the activities overview. > > > > Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind > > activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone

Re: activities overview, take N

On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 12:45 PM, Yuen Hoe Lim wrote: > > * associating a Window with an Activity could happen in one of two places: >> a >> new button in the window title bar (would mean some adjustment to kwin) >> that >> would list activities from nepomuk. the other place would be the context

plasma+nepomuk activities, take N

Hi all, I've seen the thread about the activities overview. Since there are bound to be some changes in the concepts behind activities, virtual desktops etc. I'll postpone the plasma+nepomuk integration in order to introduce it alongside the new overview (I guess we'll be able to do it for 4.5

Re: activities overview, take N

> * associating a Window with an Activity could happen in one of two places: > a > new button in the window title bar (would mean some adjustment to kwin) > that > would list activities from nepomuk. the other place would be the context > menu > of items in the tasks widget > > Hmm, I think it's hi