Oh, fsck, meeting was yesterday and not today... sorry...
On 13 September 2010 00:13, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
hi all..
thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on irc:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
--
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a
On Sunday 12 September 2010, Giulio Camuffo wrote:
I've hacked a bit with it and i saw that there are actually only two
classes needed to make an interface like the widget explorer: AbstractIcon
and AbstractIconList.
Can we make those two public?
Giulio
i think you should stick with a
On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all..
thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
irc:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
ok, thanks a lot, and sorry aain to not be able to be there.
I have some points to make/questions to ask on the
A Segunda, 13 de Setembro de 2010 09:45:38 Marco Martin você escreveu:
On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all..
thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
irc:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
ok, thanks a lot, and sorry
Quoting Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
* QtComponents/ QML bindings
- we need a timeframe for QtComponents, but i guess it will pass a
quite long
time before it makes it in a qt release
- i think that for this reason bindings for the plasma widgets are still
needed, at worst the plasma
On Monday 13 September 2010, Artur de Souza wrote:
Quoting Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
* QtComponents/ QML bindings
- we need a timeframe for QtComponents, but i guess it will pass a
quite long
time before it makes it in a qt release
- i think that for this reason
Quoting Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
well, not really faster, since the binding of the widgets is exactly the only
part that right now is finished and working perfectly.
the problem as usual, is the layouting, bad interaction between the qgw based
ones and qdi based ones, but at least is
So my question is: Is anyone here interested in implementing it or maybe
already doing so?
i haven't started doing so, and i don't know of anyone who has.
so, do you plan to do so?
___
Plasma-devel mailing list
Plasma-devel@kde.org
On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
hi all..
thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
irc:
http://community.kde.org/Plasma/20100912
another thing i did forgot to add before:
i'll have to finish the dataengine caching gsoc (also there, i hope
On Monday 13 September 2010, Artur de Souza wrote:
Quoting Marco Martin notm...@gmail.com:
well, not really faster, since the binding of the widgets is exactly the
only part that right now is finished and working perfectly.
the problem as usual, is the layouting, bad interaction between the
Hi Marco,
On Monday 13 September 2010 16:10:54 Marco Martin wrote:
now, maybe when qtcomponents will be ready it could be decided to just use
those widgets, again if they will be good enough for the desktop.
That's what I'm trying to say: qt-components will probably never be ready as
the
On Monday 13 September 2010, Artur Duque de Souza wrote:
Hi Marco,
On Monday 13 September 2010 16:10:54 Marco Martin wrote:
now, maybe when qtcomponents will be ready it could be decided to just
use those widgets, again if they will be good enough for the desktop.
That's what I'm trying
Hi,
Sorry I didn't attend, went house-hacking and had a birthday party last
weekend, didn't do much computer-stuff as a result. Let me add my plans
anyway.
On Monday, September 13, 2010 00:13:23 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
thanks to everyone who attended, here are notes from today's meeting on
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5320/#review7578
---
To be honest, I don't like this patch.
The correct solution is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5320/#review7579
---
First of all, thanks for looking into this and most of all for
On 2010-09-13 16:16:21, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
To be honest, I don't like this patch.
The correct solution is to get a SIGNAL resumed(), which is caught by the
dataengines and which then just updates. The polling and retrying in
timeengine.cpp is really ugly, IMO. (No offense ;))
On 2010-09-13 16:44:03, Dario Freddi wrote:
First of all, thanks for looking into this and most of all for submitting a
patch.
Unfortunately, just like Sebastian said, I'm afraid I'm not willing to let
this patch in. However, in the upcoming solid sprint I plan to address
this.
On 2010-09-12 21:47:38, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/tests/configloadertest.cpp, line 172
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5329/diff/1/?file=35739#file35739line172
I am not sure why, but actual is always empty.
I can't figure out the reason, because
On Monday, September 13, 2010 18:52:03 Björn Ruberg wrote:
On 2010-09-13 16:44:03, Dario Freddi wrote:
First of all, thanks for looking into this and most of all for
submitting a patch.
Unfortunately, just like Sebastian said, I'm afraid I'm not willing to
let this patch in.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5329/
---
(Updated 2010-09-13 17:51:03.041714)
Review request for Plasma.
Changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://svn.reviewboard.kde.org/r/5329/#review7582
---
Ship it!
looks great; and it shows a problem in ConfigLoader -
* Activities
- i still have to understand if i really want activities on plasma
netbook/mobile or if containments are enough for the job
iirc at akademy we agreed it was better... although there was some talk about
getting the session stuff stable first? hrm. should've written things
On Monday 13 September 2010, Chani wrote:
* Activities
- i still have to understand if i really want activities on plasma
netbook/mobile or if containments are enough for the job
iirc at akademy we agreed it was better... although there was some talk
about getting the session
On 2010-09-13 16:44:03, Dario Freddi wrote:
First of all, thanks for looking into this and most of all for submitting a
patch.
Unfortunately, just like Sebastian said, I'm afraid I'm not willing to let
this patch in. However, in the upcoming solid sprint I plan to address
this.
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Anton Kreuzkamp wrote:
So my question is: Is anyone here interested in implementing it or
maybe
already doing so?
i haven't started doing so, and i don't know of anyone who has.
so, do you plan to do so?
not currently. it's not because i don't
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
On Monday 13 September 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
* Activities
- i still have to understand if i really want activities on plasma
netbook/mobile or if containments are enough for the job
personally, i think that for plasma-netbook itself,
On Monday, September 13, 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
- with konact mobile... yes, i feel potentilly there is a quite big amount
of duplication, honestly didn't had the energy to ctually check tough :)
oh, and i've actually started talking with Kevin about this ... we'll see
where it goes. :)
Hello everybody,
yesterday took place a Plasma irc meeting.
I was busy, so I want to say some words now,
about Plasma Classroom: I think it's time to
set up a folder on svn for this project. It could
be created cloning the folder of plasma-desktop,
so everyone could start writing code and discuss
On Sunday, September 12, 2010 18:38:04 Rohan Garg wrote:
Sorry that im waayy behind the schedule on this one, since this is my first
patch to plasma, it might take another 10 days to perfect it, ive already
fixed most of the issues with my patch on reviewboard for folderview, just
need to fix
On Monday, September 13, 2010 21:12:37 Björn Ruberg wrote:
I would be fine reworking the patch in that manner IF it will be accepted
then. May be I get some stubs provided so that I know where I have to go
into powerdevil/solid.
That's up to Dario and Kevin, I don't object in principle, if
On Monday 13 September 2010, Marco Martin wrote:
For the use of private classes on dataengine bindings: also don't expect
for 4.7 the export of classes...it may happen on 4.8 but no idea when
it's going out :P So we need to think together about a way of getting
rid of it. Which private
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 12:55 AM, Aaron J. Seigo ase...@kde.org wrote:
feedback time: was this a useful / helpful way to go about getting such
improvements done? for those who got involved: was it enjoyable for you, and
would you do it again?
It was definitely a nice way to get into hacking on
32 matches
Mail list logo
