On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 08:15:28 you wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 12:20 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > and even then, it would not be trivial to use it from a simple file
> > > action script.
> >
> > Eh? You can't easily use d-bu
> you can, but think about the structure of a dbus service that maps to the
> wallpapers in a multiple-containment layout. i doubt we'd end up with a nice
> single "setWallpaper" method without it being rather simplified (e.g. only
> possible to set the wallpaper for the current desktop, current sc
On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 13:26:28 Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
> On 15 June 2011 09:20, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > what would this achieve? the layout in the module is the "normal" one we
> > have elsewhere. why would we or anyone else care how a plasmoid is
> > implemented? note that right now a
On 15 June 2011 09:20, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> what would this achieve? the layout in the module is the "normal" one we have
> elsewhere. why would we or anyone else care how a plasmoid is implemented?
> note that right now all the plasmoids we ship have at least some C++ in them,
> so there isn't
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101582/
---
Review request for Plasma and Aaron J. Seigo.
Summary
---
hello,
sin
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Tuesday, June 14, 2011 16:48:03 Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
>> I am highly interested in helping refactoring the kdeplasma-addons
>> repository.(Of course if it is being decided.)
>>
>> What do you think?
>
> i think having a place for 3r
In data Wednesday 15 June 2011 10:50:53, Marco Martin ha scritto:
> a minimum level of quality assured. there, the difference between c++ and
On that regard, I'd suggest to look at kimpanel and see whether it's worth
keeping in kdeplasma-addons or not. It's unmaintained and at least personally
On Tuesday 14 June 2011, Giorgos Tsiapaliwkas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [...]
>
> I am highly interested in helping refactoring the kdeplasma-addons
> repository.(Of course if it is being decided.)
>
> What do you think?
to me kdeplasma-addons is good as is, a set (as small as possible) of plasmoid