Hello!
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Ben Cooksley wrote:
>
> Please see http://build.kde.org/job/kdeplasma-addons_master/ and
> http://build.kde.org/job/kdeplasma-addons_stable/
Sorry I should have mentioned about frameworks branch.
Thanks!
--
Bhushan Shah
http://bhush9.github.io
IRC Nic
On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Bhushan Shah wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Currently I am porting stuffs in kdeplasma-addons but as I see there
> is no build of kdeplasma-addons on CI system. If someone can setup it
> it will be very good. I know there are not much things in repo but it
> is moving forward
Hello!
Currently I am porting stuffs in kdeplasma-addons but as I see there
is no build of kdeplasma-addons on CI system. If someone can setup it
it will be very good. I know there are not much things in repo but it
is moving forward. ;)
Thanks!
--
Bhushan Shah
http://bhush9.github.io
IRC Nick
On Friday 27 December 2013 20:27:48 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Friday 27 December 2013 09:50:46 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
> > So, if DataEngines are needed (I do not doubt that) let's continue having
> > them but let's stop pretending they are not public API or that they are
> > meant only for a quick hack
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114681/#review46229
---
This was already done in the master branch.
origin/frameworks
Hello my friends!
You probably have seen my post on planet.kde
(http://blog.morpheuz.cc/26/12/2013/open-academy-and-kde/) about
OpenAcademy and the possibility of sponsoring students to work on KDE.
I would love to have some students working on Plasma, but for that we
need mentors. Anyone willing
On Friday 27 December 2013 09:50:46 Àlex Fiestas wrote:
>
> So, if DataEngines are needed (I do not doubt that) let's continue having
> them but let's stop pretending they are not public API or that they are
> meant only for a quick hack. We don't want hacks do we? :p
+1 for de-hackify them ;)
my
On Tuesday 24 December 2013 20:13:58 Marco Martin wrote:
> for many things yes, but they are not mutually exclusive.
> I see imports more as standalone, high quality,stable api public libraries,
> while dataengines more as q quick mean of data fetching.
Please, DataEngines have given us many issues
On Fri, Dec 27, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Saturday, December 21, 2013 19:50:30 Mark Gaiser wrote:
>> I hope some of the plasma folks can provide some feedback on the ideas
>> proposed in this thread.
>
> Which ideas exactly? The thread is quite convoluted, and it's hard to make
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/
---
(Updated Dec. 27, 2013, 4:29 p.m.)
Status
--
This change has been ma
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/#review46194
---
This review has been submitted with commit
778bf0ac0b057db190
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/#review46193
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On Dec. 27, 2013, 2
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114682/#review46192
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Heena Mahour
On Dec. 27, 2013, 1:59 p.
On Saturday, December 21, 2013 19:50:30 Mark Gaiser wrote:
> I hope some of the plasma folks can provide some feedback on the ideas
> proposed in this thread.
Which ideas exactly? The thread is quite convoluted, and it's hard to make
sense of it to me. I also might be missing an email or two.
If
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114683/
---
Review request for Build System, KDE Frameworks and Plasma.
Repository: p
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114682/#review46187
---
Ship it!
Looking good!
- Sebastian Kügler
On Dec. 27, 2013
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/114682/#review46186
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- David Edmundson
On Dec. 27, 2013, 1:59
On Monday 23 December 2013 19:45:36 Alex Merry wrote:
> On 23/12/13 18:46, Aurélien Gâteau wrote:
> > - plasma-framework: this framework uses multiple licenses, but majority is
> > LGPL (this is the case for many other frameworks). Should we use a LGPL
> > 2.1
> > COPYING.LIB file?
>
> A quick att
18 matches
Mail list logo