Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-workspace Description

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/#review63040 --- Also another problem connected to this: how to take the

Review Request 119452: Rename libkworkspace for coinstallability with kde-workspace4.

2014-07-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119452/ --- Review request for Plasma. Repository: plasma-workspace Description

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/#review63037 --- lookandfeelaccess/lookandfeelaccess.cpp

Re: Review Request 119452: Rename libkworkspace for coinstallability with kde-workspace4.

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119452/#review63043 --- Ship it! fine for me - Marco Martin On Lug. 24, 2014,

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:34 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: lookandfeelaccess/lookandfeelaccess.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/diff/1/?file=292284#file292284line89 My concern is this will create more problems than it's worth. Scenario: - I add a

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:34 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: lookandfeelaccess/shellpluginloader.h, line 31 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/diff/1/?file=292285#file292285line31 not used? that is just the header 1:1 coming from libplasmaquick, usual old problem - Marco

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:34 a.m., Marco Martin wrote: I'd quite like to have a chat about the goals of look and feel (next Monday meeting?). It was something where you guys clearly had a plan (or at least a name) before I got more heavily involved in Plasma, and I'm really not on the same

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread David Edmundson
On July 24, 2014, 10:34 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: lookandfeelaccess/lookandfeelaccess.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/diff/1/?file=292284#file292284line89 My concern is this will create more problems than it's worth. Scenario: - I add a

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/#review63049 --- src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:34 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: lookandfeelaccess/lookandfeelaccess.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/diff/1/?file=292284#file292284line89 My concern is this will create more problems than it's worth. Scenario: - I add a

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/ --- (Updated July 24, 2014, 11:14 a.m.) Review request for Plasma. Changes

Re: Review Request 119451: some machinery for look and feel package

2014-07-24 Thread Martin Gräßlin
On July 24, 2014, 12:34 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: lookandfeelaccess/lookandfeelaccess.cpp, line 89 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119451/diff/1/?file=292284#file292284line89 My concern is this will create more problems than it's worth. Scenario: - I add a

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread David Edmundson
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119425: Cache the textures created for the fast path

2014-07-24 Thread Aleix Pol Gonzalez
On July 24, 2014, 10:55 a.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/core/framesvgitem.cpp, line 45 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119425/diff/2/?file=292260#file292260line45 Having spoken to you offline this does make sense, but it needs documentation as to why it's

Re: Review Request 119452: Rename libkworkspace for coinstallability with kde-workspace4.

2014-07-24 Thread Michael Palimaka
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119452/ --- (Updated July 24, 2014, 3:40 p.m.) Status -- This change has been

Build failed in Jenkins: plasma-desktop_master_qt5 #487

2014-07-24 Thread KDE CI System
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-desktop_master_qt5/487/changes Changes: [kensington] Fix header include to match plasma-workspace change. -- [...truncated 2488 lines...]

Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/ --- Review request for KDE Frameworks and Plasma. Repository:

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Andrew Lake
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/#review63086 --- Exciting! Might this eventually support a ButtonStyle.qml

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/#review63087 --- Concerning the icon names: for the Desktops Effects KCM the

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 4:18 p.m., Andrew Lake wrote: Exciting! Might this eventually support a ButtonStyle.qml in the plasma theme that overrides the svg-based ButtonStyle if it's present? That way we could take the already developed Breeze ButtonStyle.qml and just ship it in the

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 4:20 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: Concerning the icon names: for the Desktops Effects KCM the names are working without me doing anything. So there must be a solution hidden in the widgets emulating style. yes, the native style figures out that internally, creates an

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/ --- (Updated July 24, 2014, 4:31 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread David Edmundson
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/#review63091 ---

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 4:56 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/plasmacomponents/qml/styles/ButtonStyle.qml, line 41 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/diff/2/?file=292510#file292510line41 This isn't very declarative, is there a reason we can't do:

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
On July 24, 2014, 4:56 p.m., David Edmundson wrote: src/declarativeimports/plasmacomponents/qml/styles/ButtonStyle.qml, line 83 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/diff/2/?file=292510#file292510line83 style.labelImplicitWidth doesn't exist? gah, leftover - Marco

Re: Review Request 119455: make Button a QtControl

2014-07-24 Thread Marco Martin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/119455/ --- (Updated July 24, 2014, 6:17 p.m.) Review request for KDE Frameworks and

Jenkins build is back to normal : plasma-desktop_master_qt5 #488

2014-07-24 Thread KDE CI System
See http://build.kde.org/job/plasma-desktop_master_qt5/488/changes ___ Plasma-devel mailing list Plasma-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/plasma-devel