On Saturday, February 01, 2014 19:33:31 Michael Jansen wrote:
> > > > And as already discussed using the date of the final release in
> > > > pre-releases is dangerous.
> > >
> > > Whatever you guys decide to use. It would be nice if it would be
> > > compatible to
> > >
> > > http://semver.org/
>
> > >
> > > And as already discussed using the date of the final release in
> > > pre-releases is dangerous.
> >
> > Whatever you guys decide to use. It would be nice if it would be
> > compatible
> > to
> >
> > http://semver.org/
> >
> > This is the only attempt to standardize versions i know
On Saturday 01 February 2014 15:19:57 Michael Jansen wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 12:06:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:50:34 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Martin Gräßlin
>
> wrote:
> > > > What we should consider when using such a
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 12:06:27 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:50:34 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Martin Gräßlin
wrote:
> > > What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it
> > > also
> > > works with beta releases o
On Tuesday 28 January 2014 11:50:34 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it also
> > works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what we
> > use
> > today it could
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
>
> What we should consider when using such a numbering scheme is that it also
> works with beta releases of Plasma Next. If we kind of stick to what we use
> today it could be.
> 2014.06-90 for the beta release of Plasma Next with the last s
On Monday 27 January 2014 21:45:48 Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> 2014-01-27 Albert Astals Cid :
> > El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va
escriure:
> >> I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might
> >> be
> >> better. Then the fourth packaging o
2014-01-27 Albert Astals Cid :
> El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va escriure:
>> I recall seeing -x often as distro-package-versions, so 2014.06.2 might be
>> better. Then the fourth packaging of 2014.06.2 will be 2014.06.2-4.
>
> Just after reading the email I also
El Dilluns, 27 de gener de 2014, a les 15:05:43, Jos Poortvliet va escriure:
> On Monday 27 January 2014 14:37:03 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I've processed the discussion in the previous thread, we discussed it a
> > bit
> > in today's Plasma Monday hangout and here is a reiterati
On Monday, January 27, 2014 15:30:09 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> I remember several cases where we had issues which were not large enough to
> stop the rolling of all of KDE SC, but there were certainly enough issues
> which should have stopped a Plasma release. So I do hope that we use this
> chance
On Monday 27 January 2014 15:14:46 Sebastian Kügler wrote:
> On Monday, January 27, 2014 15:05:43 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > > * Inside Plasma team, we'll start referring to the next version simply
> > > as
> > >
> > > "Plasma Next". This will always be the "next major version to be
> > > release
On Monday, January 27, 2014 15:05:43 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > * Inside Plasma team, we'll start referring to the next version simply as
> >
> > "Plasma Next". This will always be the "next major version to be
> > released".
> > We encourage everyone to start using "Plasma Next", we don't want thi
On Monday 27 January 2014 14:37:03 Martin Klapetek wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've processed the discussion in the previous thread, we discussed it a bit
> in today's Plasma Monday hangout and here is a reiteration of the naming
> proposal. Please please /always/ keep plasma-devel in CC, if not, I'll
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
