Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2017-02-08 Thread Pino Toscano
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/ --- (Updated Feb. 8, 2017, 11:48 a.m.) Status -- This change has been di

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Sebastian Kügler
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/#review96137 --- Speaking with the maintainer's hat on: I don't want this. He

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/#review96135 --- Just to be clear: by doing the review, I do not change my min

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On June 1, 2016, 10:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Pino Toscano
> On June 1, 2016, 8:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering l

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On June 1, 2016, 10:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Marco Martin
On Wednesday 01 June 2016 09:08:48 Pino Toscano wrote: > > Bhushan Shah wrote: > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2015-July/008725.html > > > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-distro-packagers/2015-July/76.html > > https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2015-July/00872

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Pino Toscano
> On June 1, 2016, 8:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering l

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Bhushan Shah
> On June 1, 2016, 1:43 p.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering l

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On June 1, 2016, 10:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Pino Toscano
> On June 1, 2016, 8:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering l

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Gräßlin
> On June 1, 2016, 10:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. > > Pino Toscano wrote: > Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with > non-Linux platforms; considering

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Pino Toscano
> On June 1, 2016, 8:13 a.m., Martin Gräßlin wrote: > > -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for explanation > > why we don't want this. Nowhere there is discussed (only briefly mentioned) about support with non-Linux platforms; considering libkscreen is a library used by c

Re: Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Martin Gräßlin
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/#review96120 --- -2, see also https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=361954 for

Review Request 128073: Make Wayland optional

2016-06-01 Thread Pino Toscano
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/128073/ --- Review request for Plasma, Solid, Daniel Vrátil, Martin Gräßlin, and Sebast