On Saturday 09 June 2012, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, June 9, 2012 13:11:21 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > As notmart said in one of the threads where we discussed the vision,
> > does the user want to execute an application or what he/s
On Saturday 09 June 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Friday, June 8, 2012 22:54:03 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > we have kde-baseapps, and i agree what you've said previously that
> > wewould benefit from having a defined set of "core applications
On Saturday 09 June 2012 16:29:10 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, June 9, 2012 14:13:49 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 June 2012 13:18:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Saturday, June 9, 2012 12:37:47 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > > There might be a misunderstanding. I do not say that
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 14:05:15 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> PowerDevil - Solid::Control::Power
btw, thanks to this design, i expect next week we'll drop in an Android power
management backend (into a branch of course .. :)
why? we got a new revision of the vivaldi hardware last month that has
gene
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 14:13:49 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 09 June 2012 13:18:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Saturday, June 9, 2012 12:37:47 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > > There might be a misunderstanding. I do not say that we have to require
> > > OpenGL compositing, I'm saying that the
On Saturday 09 June 2012 13:18:04 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, June 9, 2012 12:37:47 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > There might be a misunderstanding. I do not say that we have to require
> > OpenGL compositing, I'm saying that the stack underneath us broke for the
> > non composited case (eithe
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> Also from looking at the KWin source base I have to disagree about the
> benefits of keeping code portable. It makes the code ugly, adds additional
> ifdefs. Keeping the source compiled with different compiles is a good thing,
> that's why I
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 13:11:21 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> As notmart said in one of the threads where we discussed the vision,
> does the user want to execute an application or what he/she wants is
> to read the pdf?
that does not make the a
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 12:37:47 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> There might be a misunderstanding. I do not say that we have to require
> OpenGL compositing, I'm saying that the stack underneath us broke for the
> non composited case (either XRender or OpenGL). If you want I can search
> for the bug rep
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> interesting, I would consider gwenview part of the workspace as I think an
>> image viewer is nowadays one of the most essential applications a user
>> needs.
>
> 'how essential is the application' is not the measuring stick we've been
> us
On Saturday 09 June 2012 11:13:16 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Saturday, June 9, 2012 10:28:05 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> > On Saturday 09 June 2012 04:45:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > * losing portability to non-Linux (and even specific Linux OSes)
> >
> > something I would like to discuss in the ligh
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 10:28:05 Martin Gräßlin wrote:
> On Saturday 09 June 2012 04:45:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > * losing portability to non-Linux (and even specific Linux OSes)
>
> something I would like to discuss in the light of workspace.
>
> I think we all agree that we do neither target
On Saturday 09 June 2012 04:45:51 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> * losing portability to non-Linux (and even specific Linux OSes)
something I would like to discuss in the light of workspace.
I think we all agree that we do neither target MS Windows nor OS X. (I know
you can run plasma-desktop on Windows
On Saturday, June 9, 2012 02:22:43 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > On Friday, June 8, 2012 22:54:03 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> > we have kde-baseapps, and i agree what you've said previously that wewould
> > benefit from having a defined set of "core app
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On Friday, June 8, 2012 22:54:03 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> we have kde-baseapps, and i agree what you've said previously that wewould
> benefit from having a defined set of "core applications"
Lately I have been doing a lot of thinking with the
On Friday, June 8, 2012 22:54:03 Alex Fiestas wrote:
> Where will dolphin be? An application with Blue dot?
i think so, yes.
to beh noest, i really struggled with where file management belonged in the
past. what it came down to was the it runs just fine outside of KDE's
workspaces (a lot of peo
On Friday 08 June 2012, Alex Fiestas wrote:
> On Friday, June 08, 2012 10:01:35 PM Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > hi...
> >
> > here is a rough block diagram of the overall kde software stack:
> > http://plasma.kde.org/media/kde_block_diagram.png
>
> Apart from useful and complete beautiful :p
>
On Friday, June 08, 2012 10:01:35 PM Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> hi...
>
> here is a rough block diagram of the overall kde software stack:
>
> http://plasma.kde.org/media/kde_block_diagram.png
Apart from useful and complete beautiful :p
Where will dolphin be? An application with Blue dot?
Th
hi...
here is a rough block diagram of the overall kde software stack:
http://plasma.kde.org/media/kde_block_diagram.png
some notes:
* the applications have little dots in them:
Blue -> desktop
Pink -> Touch (Harmattan, Active, ...)
Universal -> one UI, works eve
19 matches
Mail list logo
