plasma-shell and -std=c++0x flag

Hi all, Following the previous discussions on k-c-d where it was concluded that the workspace-related code (as opposed to the libs) can use more modern c++ features as long as those are not introduced after gcc 4.5, I'd like to ask whether there are objections to add the -std=c++0x flag

Re: plasma-shell and -std=c++0x flag

there are objections to add the -std=c++0x flag to the plasma-shell (plasma2) build? obvious +1 (will do the same for KWin once 4.11 is branched). What about clang? Does it need an additional parameter? Cheers Martin ___ Plasma-devel mailing list

Re: plasma-shell and -std=c++0x flag

obvious +1 (will do the same for KWin once 4.11 is branched). What about clang? Does it need an additional parameter? Yes, it (fortunately) uses the same one. -- Cheerio, Ivan -- While you were hanging yourself on someone else's words Dying to believe in what you heard I was staring straight

Re: plasma-shell and -std=c++0x flag

whether there are objections to add the -std=c++0x flag to the plasma-shell (plasma2) build? yes, realy good idea. would love to see all the dptrs move to your spiffy d_ptr smart pointer as well. -- Aaron J. Seigo signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: plasma-shell and -std=c++0x flag

Martin ovious +1 Heh, I can always count on you when I mention c++11 :D Aaron yes, realy good idea. Cool, I promise I will not go overboard like with some kactivities parts :) Cheerio, Ivan -- Acting is merely the art of keeping a large group of people from coughing. -- Sir Ralph