Re: jabber c2s dead loop

2005-09-10 Thread Aredridel
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:30:33PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 18:53:40 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > > select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 1}) = 0 (Timeout) > > > > Only kill -9 helps. > > Broken db files. Is there any trustworthy jabberd implementation for > Linux? I'm

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 11:31:35 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > I dont care what you want. Your help in developing PLD is marginal. Indeed, thanks to people like you. I'm tired of 'hey, who has broken mysql today?' > No, read again. Scripts needs to be written the same way as for cvs. svn

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 14:27:38 +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > > cvs ci SPECS/foo.spec SOURCES/foo.patch > > > > worse than the same in svn? > > Because it won't work with cvs unless you add -d$(cat SPECS/CVS/Root) :P It will. It would require putting SOURCES and SPECS into higher level repo.

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 14:48:17 +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > > It can work, but you'd have to checkout rpm module, which contains > > SPECS/ and SOURCES/ > > Yes, but then you have to use the ugly trick of "press Ctrl+C after a > few lines". No. cvs co rpm/SPECS/foo and you have CVS/Entries

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Saturday 10 September 2005 15:48, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 14:40 +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:27:38PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 02:59 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > > > I don't get it. Why is: > > > > > > > > cvs

Re: jabber c2s dead loop

2005-09-10 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 18:53:40 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > select(0, NULL, NULL, NULL, {0, 1}) = 0 (Timeout) > > Only kill -9 helps. Broken db files. Is there any trustworthy jabberd implementation for Linux? -- GoTaR gotar>http://vfmg.sourceforge.net/

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Fri, 2005-09-09 at 09:40 +0100, wrobell wrote: > [svn log] -> few days please. While we're at revolutionary ideas... Currently %changelog doesn't really correspond to the CVS commit log. It is subject to truncation, editing (adding CAN entries, fixing typos, rewording). Furthermore, at some po

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 14:40 +0200, Adam Gołębiowski wrote: > On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:27:38PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 02:59 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > > I don't get it. Why is: > > > > > > cvs ci SPECS/foo.spec SOURCES/foo.patch > > > > > > worse than the same

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Adam Gołębiowski
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 02:27:38PM +0200, Paweł Sakowski wrote: > On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 02:59 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > > I don't get it. Why is: > > > > cvs ci SPECS/foo.spec SOURCES/foo.patch > > > > worse than the same in svn? > > Because it won't work with cvs unless you add -d$(cat SPECS/

Re: cvs vs svn...

2005-09-10 Thread Paweł Sakowski
On Sat, 2005-09-10 at 02:59 +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote: > I don't get it. Why is: > > cvs ci SPECS/foo.spec SOURCES/foo.patch > > worse than the same in svn? Because it won't work with cvs unless you add -d$(cat SPECS/CVS/Root) :P BTW, that's another reason for directory-per-package. With SPECS/S

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Jan Rekorajski
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 10 of September 2005 12:48, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > svn: see how creating diff between release and branch of kdebase package > > > is: svn diff svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/tag

Re: mythtv.spec

2005-09-10 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Saturday 10 September 2005 04:31, Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote: > Krystian T wrote: > > Hi > > I have built mythtv.spec --without nvidia and it's failed > > (X11-driver-nvidia is needed) > > I have looked in spec and I find > > %{?with_nvidia:BuildRequires: X11-driver-nvidia-devel} > > %{?with

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Saturday 10 of September 2005 12:48, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > On Fri, 09 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > svn: see how creating diff between release and branch of kdebase package > > is: svn diff svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/tags/KDE/3.4.2/kdebase \ > > svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/b

Re: mythtv.spec

2005-09-10 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Saturday 10 September 2005 13:26, Krystian T wrote: > Dnia 07-09-2005, śro o godzinie 14:31 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a): > ... > > > replaced that all with xvmc wrapper. could you test does it (still) work? > > I have build from mythtv.spec rev.1.30. > Wath tv & time shifting work :) but I c

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Saturday 10 of September 2005 12:42, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > And so what? For merging rpm from head to ac-branch you need to review > > spec and _all_ patches. spec + patches is like sources, no difference. > > And svn changes _nothing_ here,

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Saturday 10 September 2005 13:48, Jan Rekorajski wrote: > Side note about command line - it's what pisses me the most in svn, the > requirement to type whole long URLs. I don't need to know them, it's the > scm job to remember root dir for a repository/module. > With cvs I just do 'cvs up -r TAG

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Jan Rekorajski
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > svn: see how creating diff between release and branch of kdebase package is: > svn diff svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/tags/KDE/3.4.2/kdebase \ > svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/branches/KDE/3.4/kdebase \ > > kdebase-branch.diff > _without_ having

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Jan Rekorajski
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > And so what? For merging rpm from head to ac-branch you need to review spec > and _all_ patches. spec + patches is like sources, no difference. And svn changes _nothing_ here, I still would have to review all the patches regardless of scm :/ SV

Re: mythtv.spec

2005-09-10 Thread Krystian T
Dnia 07-09-2005, śro o godzinie 14:31 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a): ... > replaced that all with xvmc wrapper. could you test does it (still) work? > I have build from mythtv.spec rev.1.30. Wath tv & time shifting work :) but I can't record :( Perhaps my config problem(?) I use tv-card but only

Re: cvs vs svn... (Re: SOURCES: ghostscript-afpl-am.patch (NEW), ghostscript-afpl-ijs_pkg...)

2005-09-10 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Saturday 10 of September 2005 02:59, Tomasz Pala wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 23:28:32 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > Do you know that here you are not talking about cvs vs svn but about how > > we want to organise repository layout? > > We don't. rpmbuild uses flat structure and so