Re: ANN: Closing AC

2005-12-23 Thread Jakub Piotr Cłapa
Tomasz Pala napisał(a): > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 18:14:48 +0100, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote: > >> boost from concurrency since most programs/daemons don't depend on each >> other and don't need to wait for others to start first. > > If they don't depend, why do we have priorities in current init s

Re: ANN: Closing AC

2005-12-23 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 13:54:01 +0100, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote: > We have because some of them depend on others. OTOH Samba, Squid, Apache > and DHCPd rarely depend on each other. ;] So we can give them the same priority and introduce feature from patrys' blog: run everything with the same prio

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Fryderyk Dziarmagowski
--- Arkadiusz Miskiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > Please test. works pretty well on two radeons (r200 and r300). On r200 with EXA and DRI, on r300 only 2D. since yesterday no problems here. -- Fryderyk Dziarmagowski "Pleas

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Michal Kochanowicz
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:55:52PM +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > works pretty well on two radeons (r200 and r300). On r200 with EXA and > DRI, on r300 only 2D. since yesterday no problems here. Radeon 9000 == r200? I'd give it a try, but a want DRI for my daily amusement :] -- --= Micha

unpackaged apache's cgi-bin.conf

2005-12-23 Thread Jakub Bogusz
apache build reports one unpackaged file: /etc/httpd/conf.d/80_cgi-bin.conf it comes from: Source26: %{name}-mod_alias.conf install %{SOURCE26} $CFG/80_cgi-bin.conf and contains: # ScriptAlias: This controls which directories contain server scripts. # ScriptAliases are e

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Tomasz Grobelny
Dnia czwartek 22 grudnia 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał: > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > Please test. > 2 minor problems: 1. "startx -- :1" gives the following: Fatal server error: Unrecognized option: BINDIR/Xwrapper Seems that startx script needs cor

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ERRORS: pnetlib.spec pnetC.spec ml-pnet.spec OK: pnet.spec]

2005-12-23 Thread Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 08:07:13PM +0100, Bartosz Taudul wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 10:02:34PM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała > wrote: > > so - it is for compability with pnet(dotGNU) i think(?). Is it anywhere > > used? > ./nant.spec:BuildRequires: mono-compat-links >= 1.1.4

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: ERRORS: pnetlib.spec pnetC.spec ml-pnet.spec OK: pnet.spec]

2005-12-23 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 06:03:50PM +0100, Andrzej 'The Undefined' Dopierała wrote: > summary: > - pnetlib doesn't build with resgen from mono > - nant doesn't build with resgen from pnet > > how resolve it? have you any ideas? (other than remove pnet) Maybe rename pnet's resgen to, for example, p

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Bartosz Taudul
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:55:52PM +0100, Fryderyk Dziarmagowski wrote: > works pretty well on two radeons (r200 and r300). On r200 with EXA and > DRI, on r300 only 2D. since yesterday no problems here. Works, r300 with 3D acceleration. wolf -- Bartek . - Wiecie po co człowiek ma uszy? Żeby

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Tomasz Grobelny wrote: > Dnia czwartek 22 grudnia 2005 16:04, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz napisał: > > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > > > Please test. > > > 2 minor problems: > 1. "startx -- :1" gives the following: > Fatal serv

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Jakub Bogusz
Just tried it... startx displays some xkb warning: The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports: > Warning: Type "ONE_LEVEL" has 1 levels, but has 2 symbols > Ignoring extra symbols Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server And strange thing - using depreca

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Friday 23 December 2005 15:53, Tomasz Grobelny wrote: > 1. "startx -- :1" gives the following: > Fatal server error: > Unrecognized option: BINDIR/Xwrapper > Seems that startx script needs corrections.Propably BINDIR in line 23 > should have been substituted with /usr/X11R6/bin. Fixed. > 2. $

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:04:31PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > Please test. $ xvinfo Xlib: extension "XVideo" missing on display ":0.0". xvinfo: No X-Video Extension on :0 Is that expected? ATI Rage 128 based card, r1

Re: X11 monolitic 6.9.0 for AC

2005-12-23 Thread Jacek Konieczny
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 11:19:17PM +0100, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2005 at 04:04:31PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > X11 6.9.0 (monolitic) for AC is arriving to ac-test right now. > > > > Please test. > > $ xvinfo > Xlib: extension "XVideo" missing on display ":0.0". > x

Re: ANN: Closing AC

2005-12-23 Thread Jakub Piotr Cłapa
Tomasz Pala napisał(a): > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 13:54:01 +0100, Jakub Piotr Cłapa wrote: > >> We have because some of them depend on others. OTOH Samba, Squid, Apache >> and DHCPd rarely depend on each other. ;] > > So we can give them the same priority and introduce feature from patrys' > blo