Re: apache vs autoconf 2.60

2006-10-31 Thread Maciek Pasternacki
On Boomtime, Bureaucracy 73, 3172 YOLD, Jacek Konieczny wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 08:34:26PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: >> With autoconf 2.60 layout overrides configure arguments. And that's the >> main problem. > > It seems apr doesn't compile because that. Any ideas how to solve that > sy

Re: [SPECS] Diff to bzr.spec (latest stable version).

2006-10-31 Thread Maciek Pasternacki
On Setting Orange, The Aftermath 13, 3172 YOLD, arkh wrote: > First update to bzrtools.spec (newer version) :) > > Could you add AC-branch tag to bzr.spec? - it's a stable version. I don't use Ac, so I can't test if it works on Ac. It's not just matter of bzr version, but also of different envir

Re: [SPECS] Diff to bzr.spec (latest stable version).

2006-10-31 Thread arkh
First update to bzrtools.spec (newer version) :) Could you add AC-branch tag to bzr.spec? - it's a stable version. --- bzrtools.spec.orig~ 2006-11-01 00:22:29.0 +0100 +++ bzrtools.spec 2006-11-01 00:26:22.0 +0100 @@ -2,12 +2,12 @@ Summary: A collection of utilities and plugins fo

Re: [SPECS] Diff to bzr.spec (latest stable version).

2006-10-31 Thread Maciek Pasternacki
On Pungenday, The Aftermath 11, 3172 YOLD, arkh wrote: > - diff to bzr.spec - latest stable version > - new spec for bzrtools (I'm not sure if polish translation is good - > can anybody check if it's OK? ;) Commited (bzrtools.spec from the next post). Slightly modified translation -- changed Eng

Re: smtpdaemon and sendmail wrapper

2006-10-31 Thread Tomasz Wittner
On Tue 31. October 2006 21:41, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > imho they are different things > 1. smtpdaemon means something that listens port 25 > 2. sendmail wrapper is package that provides /usr/lib/sendmail > > are there any program that really needs smtpdaemon in this context? > > i'd propose to use

smtpdaemon and sendmail wrapper

2006-10-31 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
imho they are different things 1. smtpdaemon means something that listens port 25 2. sendmail wrapper is package that provides /usr/lib/sendmail are there any program that really needs smtpdaemon in this context? i'd propose to use /usr/lib/sendmail Provides/Requires pairs when program needs /us

Re: SPECS: gnutls.spec - updated to 1.4.4 (fixes CVE-2006-4790)

2006-10-31 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:01, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > ping > > Would sb bacport a fix or are we switching Ac to use autoconf 2.60 and > making libtasn1 soname change? i'd go for ac, am upgrade. if all apps compile with new libtasn1 - no blocker for soname change. hawk? > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 a

Re: SPECS: webalizer.spec - -base instead of -cron as suggested by blu...

2006-10-31 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:39:51PM +0200, Paweł Gołaszewski wrote: > On Thu, 26 Oct 2006, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > Author: glen Date: Wed Oct 25 21:52:26 2006 GMT > > > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > > > Log message: > > > - -base instead of -cron as

Re: [qmail] remove all.rbl.kropka.net from default conf-rblsmtpd

2006-10-31 Thread sparky
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:20:50AM +0100, Jérôme Augé wrote: > Hi, > > The kropka RBL is responding "rbl.kropka.net has been SHUT DOWN. Please > DO NOT use it anymore." to rbl requests, thus rejecting all incoming > messages. In this case probably nothing will be done unless you send patch for

Re: SPECS: gnutls.spec - updated to 1.4.4 (fixes CVE-2006-4790)

2006-10-31 Thread Jakub Bogusz
ping Would sb bacport a fix or are we switching Ac to use autoconf 2.60 and making libtasn1 soname change? On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:20:27PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 09:08:38PM +0200, qboosh wrote: > > Author: qboosh Date: Mon Sep 25 19:08:38 200

[qmail] remove all.rbl.kropka.net from default conf-rblsmtpd

2006-10-31 Thread Jérôme Augé
Hi, The kropka RBL is responding "rbl.kropka.net has been SHUT DOWN. Please DO NOT use it anymore." to rbl requests, thus rejecting all incoming messages. --- conf-rblsmtpd.orig 2006-10-31 11:10:25.0 +0100 +++ conf-rblsmtpd 2006-10-31 11:10:33.0 +0100 @@ -32,9 +32,6 @@

Re: ac builder

2006-10-31 Thread Marcin Król
> 2. also glibc-amd64 uprade had failed ok (to prevent future problems that > should be still done) Done. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en