Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Tomasz Trojanowski
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 23:26 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:57, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > > > > --- libtooldeps.sh.orig 2006-11-26 00:16:19 +0100 > > > > +++ libtooldeps.sh 2006-11-26 22:06:56 +0100 > > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > > > > do > > >

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 11:26:15PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:57, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > > > --- libtooldeps.sh.orig 2006-11-26 00:16:19 +0100 > > > > +++ libtooldeps.sh 2006-11-26 22:06:56 +0100 > > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > > > > do >

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:57, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > > --- libtooldeps.sh.orig 2006-11-26 00:16:19 +0100 > > > +++ libtooldeps.sh 2006-11-26 22:06:56 +0100 > > > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > > > do > > > case "$dep" in > > > /*.la) > > > +

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 10:57:33PM +0100, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:12, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > > > Of course there are still problems. > > > > > > > > libdb.la symlink to real file libdb-4.5.l

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Tomasz Trojanowski
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 22:22 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:12, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > > > Of course there are still problems. > > > > > > libdb.la symlink to real file libdb-4.5.la > > > > > > Now other packages get R: libtool(libdb.la) but nothing provi

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Sunday 26 November 2006 22:12, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > > Of course there are still problems. > > > > libdb.la symlink to real file libdb-4.5.la > > > > Now other packages get R: libtool(libdb.la) but nothing provides it since > > it's not detected. > > > > Wouldn't be it better to generate

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Nov 26, 2006, at 4:12 PM, Tomasz Trojanowski wrote: > On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 21:50 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >> On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >>> On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:10, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:26, A

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Tomasz Trojanowski
On Sun, 2006-11-26 at 21:50 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:10, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:26, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > > > > http://cvs.pld-linux

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Nov 26, 2006, at 3:50 PM, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >> On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:10, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >>> On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:26, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: >>> >>> http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bi

Re: [th/rpm] R: libtool(*.la) - good or bad

2006-11-26 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:35, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Saturday 25 November 2006 00:10, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Thursday 23 November 2006 22:26, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > > > http://cvs.pld-linux.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/SOURCES/file-offset.patch?rev=1.1 > > More hacky but