Re: uClibc 0.9.32

2011-06-29 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Thursday 30 of June 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > > On Friday 17 of June 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > > Is it OK to merge 0.9.32 on HEAD? > > > The simple static cases (busybox functions) which were reported to fail > > > wit

Re: uClibc 0.9.32

2011-06-29 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 09:49:11PM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: > On Friday 17 of June 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > > Is it OK to merge 0.9.32 on HEAD? > > The simple static cases (busybox functions) which were reported to fail > > with 0.9.31 seem to work now (tested on i686). > > This one f

Re: uClibc 0.9.32

2011-06-29 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Friday 17 of June 2011, Jakub Bogusz wrote: > Is it OK to merge 0.9.32 on HEAD? > The simple static cases (busybox functions) which were reported to fail > with 0.9.31 seem to work now (tested on i686). This one fails: [arekm@carme-pld-i686 ~]$ cat a1.c int main () { ; r

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 29.06.2011 14:25, Zsolt Udvari wrote: Hi all! I don't know should I/we do anything, but I've found this error: make[1]: ccache: Command not found Should we include "BR: ccache" to almost all spec? Or any other way? if the ccache is included into CC due it was present at build time, those

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 29.06.2011 15:21, Zsolt Udvari wrote: Nothing in default configuration requires ccache, so it should not be required. Oh, okay. But I think rpm-build-tools can suggests ccache because of default %{__cc}. ccache is not by default in %__cc, review your local ~/.rpmmacros -- glen ___

Re: packages: lftp/lftp.spec, lftp/lftp-pl.po-update.patch - added pl.po-update...

2011-06-29 Thread Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
On Sunday 19 of June 2011, qboosh wrote: > Author: qboosh Date: Sun Jun 19 14:09:55 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - added pl.po-update patch Was this send upstream? -- Arkadiusz MiśkiewiczPLD/Linux Team arekm / mave

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Zsolt Udvari
> [sparky@quad ~/rpm/packages *master]$ grep -r ccache rpm-build-macros > [sparky@quad ~/rpm/packages *master]$ > > Am I missing something ? Hm. Indeed. I thought that ccache is in the default config. Sorry ;) Zsolt ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-deve

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Przemyslaw Iskra
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:21:55PM +0200, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > > Nothing in default configuration requires ccache, so it should not be > > required. > Oh, okay. But I think rpm-build-tools can suggests ccache because of > default %{__cc}. [sparky@quad ~/rpm/packages *master]$ grep -r ccache rpm-b

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Zsolt Udvari
> Nothing in default configuration requires ccache, so it should not be > required. Oh, okay. But I think rpm-build-tools can suggests ccache because of default %{__cc}. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Przemyslaw Iskra
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:59:29PM +0200, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > Yes, I know that should install ccache. Noone says that you should. I was saying that you should have configuration matching your current system. > But I think if appears in spec > files the "BR: tar" (Sparky, you've added this line

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Zsolt Udvari
Yes, I know that should install ccache. But I think if appears in spec files the "BR: tar" (Sparky, you've added this line into awesome.spec), maybe should present "BR: ccache". As I see, you can uninstall ccache without any broken deps. Or maybe rpm-build-tools should requires ccache. Or is it not

Re: ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Przemyslaw Iskra
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 01:25:26PM +0200, Zsolt Udvari wrote: > Hi all! > > I don't know should I/we do anything, but I've found this error: > > make[1]: ccache: Command not found > > Should we include "BR: ccache" to almost all spec? Or any other way? You could start by fixing your local setup

ccache BR

2011-06-29 Thread Zsolt Udvari
Hi all! I don't know should I/we do anything, but I've found this error: make[1]: ccache: Command not found Should we include "BR: ccache" to almost all spec? Or any other way? Zsolt ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http:

Re: packages: calibre/calibre.spec - updated to 0.8.7 - updated no-update.patch...

2011-06-29 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 29.06.2011 12:40, Michal Lisowski wrote: W dniu 28.06.2011 20:00, Elan Ruusamäe pisze: On 28.06.2011 10:19, lisu wrote: Log message: - updated to 0.8.7 - updated no-update.patch - adapt locales handling to upstream changes (locale files are now placed into a single zip file) upstream

Re: packages: calibre/calibre.spec - updated to 0.8.7 - updated no-update.patch...

2011-06-29 Thread Michal Lisowski
W dniu 28.06.2011 20:00, Elan Ruusamäe pisze: On 28.06.2011 10:19, lisu wrote: Log message: - updated to 0.8.7 - updated no-update.patch - adapt locales handling to upstream changes (locale files are now placed into a single zip file) upstream is stupid does not mean we should follow it?