Re: gstreamer 0.10/1.0 policy

2012-09-24 Thread Lukasz Kies
2012/9/25 Jakub Bogusz : > What to do now? I see a few possibilities: > - keep gstreamer 0.10 using current names, package 1.0 as gstreamer1-* > (it's not what I'd like) This is something like Fedora has. > - keep gstreamer 0.10 packages as gstreamer0.10-*, upgrade gstreamer-* > packages to 1.

gstreamer 0.10/1.0 policy

2012-09-24 Thread Jakub Bogusz
gstreamer 1.0 has been released. It's mostly (at least on libraries/plugins) level parallel-installable with 0.10. Every package targeted to gstreamer 0.10 would require some effort to switch to 1.0 (at least change pkg-config check, I'm now aware of API changes). What to do now? I see a few possi

Re: (sym?-)links (Re: rpm 5.x in Th)

2012-09-24 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Sep 24, 2012, at 10:37 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.09.2012 17:13, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >> I am (mis-?)remembering a claim of using symlinks instead of copying file >> content >> with paths from packages that you claimed speeded up installs from a few >> years back. > you probably reme

(sym?-)links (Re: rpm 5.x in Th)

2012-09-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.09.2012 17:13, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: I am (mis-?)remembering a claim of using symlinks instead of copying file content with paths from packages that you claimed speeded up installs from a few years back. you probably remember case when links were used at PACKAGE BUILDING time if that w

Re: rpm 5.x in Th

2012-09-24 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Sep 24, 2012, at 9:56 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.09.2012 16:34, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >>> >last time i had upgraded python and found that moinmoin stopped working on >>> >it, so some symlinks (it was easier to symlink files and then rm ones i >>> >did not want to downgrade) and rpm -F

Re: git - renaming already existing package

2012-09-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 10.09.2012 20:45, Jakub Bogusz wrote: On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:08:36PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote: >What is the procedure to rename already existing (also on ftp) package >after moving to git? > >cvs2git howto says "ssh git@... move ... ..." instead of rename - >is it appropriate for such ca

Re: rpm 5.x in Th

2012-09-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.09.2012 16:34, Jeffrey Johnson wrote: >last time i had upgraded python and found that moinmoin stopped working on it, so some symlinks (it was easier to symlink files and then rm ones i did not want to downgrade) and rpm -Fhv *.rpm --downgrade --nomd5 > Your symlink trick is clever but I

Re: rpm 5.x in Th

2012-09-24 Thread Jeffrey Johnson
On Sep 24, 2012, at 4:17 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.09.2012 01:13, Łukasz Chrustek wrote: >> Do You (other PLD users/devs) use repackege only with --oldpackage ? >> Noone is/were using --rollback ? Or - You don't use repackage :P ? >> You never regret installing new versions of some r

www.pld-linux.org new wiki

2012-09-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
The 6 year old unmaintained MoinMoin installation at http://www.pld-linux.org/ will be replaced with DokuWiki installation the converted site is available for testing at https://www.pld-linux.org/ authentication is based on cvs password login hashes if you want to play with dokuwiki, do it in

Re: lists.pld-linux.org - ipv6 connection timed out

2012-09-24 Thread Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz
On Monday 24 of September 2012, Lukasz Kies wrote: > Hi, > > Connection to lists.pld-linux.org on ipv6 doesn't work. > > Resolving lists.pld-linux.org (lists.pld-linux.org)... > 2001:1a68:0:a:20f::4, 217.149.246.4 > Connecting to lists.pld-linux.org > (lists.pld-linux.org)|2001:1a68:0:a:20f::4|:8

lists.pld-linux.org - ipv6 connection timed out

2012-09-24 Thread Lukasz Kies
Hi, Connection to lists.pld-linux.org on ipv6 doesn't work. Resolving lists.pld-linux.org (lists.pld-linux.org)... 2001:1a68:0:a:20f::4, 217.149.246.4 Connecting to lists.pld-linux.org (lists.pld-linux.org)|2001:1a68:0:a:20f::4|:80... failed: Connection timed out. Connecting to lists.pld-linux.or

Re: rpm 5.x in Th

2012-09-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.09.2012 01:13, Łukasz Chrustek wrote: Do You (other PLD users/devs) use repackege only with --oldpackage ? Noone is/were using --rollback ? Or - You don't use repackage :P ? You never regret installing new versions of some rpms:) ? i never knew --rollback option existed, so haven't u