On Aug 13, 2013, at 1:55 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> Even if probablity reduction fixes the problem for now, I will apply Jacek's
> patch to rpm in PLD (with s/rpmbfFree/rpmfiFree/). Just changing Bloom
> filter parameters won't mean that the problem is gone, it will just make it
> harder to o
On Aug 13, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:26:38 -0400
> Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>> Yes. The Bloom filters been in use for about 3 years with no known
>> problems, including randomized installations for 5-10 linux distros
>> under a CI harness.
>>
>> THe perform
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013 12:26:38 -0400
Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> Yes. The Bloom filters been in use for about 3 years with no known
> problems, including randomized installations for 5-10 linux distros
> under a CI harness.
>
> THe performance/memory gains are significant.
>
> > Are there any other p
On Tue, 13 Aug 2013, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Trying to debug my package installation 'LOOP:' problems I have
> > instrumented the RPM source code with many 'rpmlog(RPMLOG_DEBUG, ...)',
> > so I could understand what i
On Aug 13, 2013, at 12:15 PM, Mariusz Mazur wrote:
> On Tue of August 13 2013, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
>> Meanwhile the simpler fix is to adjust the Bloom filter parameters to
>> decrease the probability of a false positive.
>
> Are you serious? You really think it's ok for rpm to be using alg
On Tue of August 13 2013, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> Meanwhile the simpler fix is to adjust the Bloom filter parameters to
> decrease the probability of a false positive.
Are you serious? You really think it's ok for rpm to be using algorithms with
a non-zero chance of false positives?
Are there
On Aug 13, 2013, at 7:47 AM, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Trying to debug my package installation 'LOOP:' problems I have
> instrumented the RPM source code with many 'rpmlog(RPMLOG_DEBUG, ...)',
> so I could understand what is happening there.
>
> After hours of such debugging I found o
Hi,
Trying to debug my package installation 'LOOP:' problems I have
instrumented the RPM source code with many 'rpmlog(RPMLOG_DEBUG, ...)',
so I could understand what is happening there.
After hours of such debugging I found out what is going on: for each
dependency rpmalSatisfiesDepend() is cal
