Re: rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm, take 3

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.04.2016 22:23, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> When was the last time a distro rebuilt a package to correct a spelling >> error typo in, say, >> the Swahili translation? > > fedora rebuilds *all* packages for each release, so each release will ha

Re: rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm, take 3

2016-04-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.04.2016 22:23, Jeff Johnson wrote: When was the last time a distro rebuilt a package to correct a spelling error typo in, say, the Swahili translation? fedora rebuilds *all* packages for each release, so each release will have whatever translations were added to .spec. altho i don't eve

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 3:20 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.04.2016 21:08, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> The fix is --without-sasl2 (not --without-sasl). My brain fart, now verified. > > thanks. indeed that's the option. > > seems libacl is also new library dependency. is there appropriate > functional

Re: rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm, take 3

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: ... > > I think that I18N could (and should) be done better in RPM. Meanwhile > devising a transparent > "legacy compatible" retrofit for RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE is/was the necessary > first step to attempting > a better implementation. > I perh

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.04.2016 21:08, Jeff Johnson wrote: The fix is --without-sasl2 (not --without-sasl). My brain fart, now verified. thanks. indeed that's the option. seems libacl is also new library dependency. is there appropriate functionality or it also slipped in somehow? [~/rpm/packages/rpm(5.4.16

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > >> On 24.04.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote: >>> So specifiying --without-sasl when building is the only (well you could >>> configure/install sasl >>> correctly before executing rpm too)

Update on kernel packages in Th

2016-04-24 Thread Jan Rękorajski
Hi, With the addition of new longterm kernel (4.4) we would have six (6) package lines to keep up. Because of this I'm removing 3.10 and 3.14 from Th to keep the number maintainable. There will be no more releases for those lines and I will move existing packages to .archive within a month. -- Ja

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > > (aside) > BTW, there is one other 1-line patch to rpmio/pkgio.c needed to plug a 16b > memory leak > in rdSignature(). The final code should look like > > ... >/* All packages should have RPMSIGTAG_MD5. */ >he->tag = (rpmTa

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.04.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> So specifiying --without-sasl when building is the only (well you could >> configure/install sasl >> correctly before executing rpm too) way to remove the syslog'd message. > > added, did not help.

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.04.2016 18:28, Jeff Johnson wrote: So specifiying --without-sasl when building is the only (well you could configure/install sasl correctly before executing rpm too) way to remove the syslog'd message. added, did not help. did not investigate further, but build log is available: http

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 10:41 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> >> something logs to syslog at this time: >> Apr 24 12:48:27 new-server rpm: looking for plugins in '/usr/lib/sasl2', >> failed to open directory, error: No such file or directory >> > > That message isn't coming from RPM afaik. > The mes

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 6:03 AM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: > On 24.04.2016 12:51, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: >> >> anyway, i finally installed the built version. the sasl2 error is probably >> from somewhere else. >> >> 12:48:25 root[load: 0.00]@new-server /# rpm -q rpm >> rpm-5.4.16-0.1.i686 > There are 1

Fwd: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
Begin forwarded message: > From: Elan Ruusamäe > Subject: Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot > Date: April 24, 2016 5:51:58 AM EDT > To: "PLD: Developers list (English)" > Reply-To: "PLD: Developers list (English)" > > On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote: >> There is a final snapshot release of rpm

Re: rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm, take 3

2016-04-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Apr 24, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Jeff Johnson wrote: > >> There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at >> >> >> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm >> >> This addresses the following issues:

Re: rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm, take 3

2016-04-24 Thread Jan Rękorajski
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Jeff Johnson wrote: > There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at > > > http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm > > This addresses the following issues: > 1) mongoc.h needed #include to rebuild with PLD configu

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 24.04.2016 12:51, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: anyway, i finally installed the built version. the sasl2 error is probably from somewhere else. 12:48:25 root[load: 0.00]@new-server /# rpm -q rpm rpm-5.4.16-0.1.i686 There are 1 package to install, 1 to remove: I filesystem-4.0-46.i686 R filesystem

Re: rpm-5.4.16 snapshot

2016-04-24 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On 20.04.2016 15:38, Jeff Johnson wrote: There is a final snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT/rpm-5.4.16-0.20160420.src.rpm baggins, could you take care of the last remaining patches on dev-5.4.16. those are both yours and i don't