Dnia 20-09-2007, Cz o godzinie 08:57 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
> On Thursday 20 of September 2007, Marcin Król wrote:
> > > So is this some kind of policy, to require newest packages possible at
> > > the time of upping spec?
> >
> > It seems so. Its stupid IMO to bump version to high
Patrys asked me to up evolution spec to 1.12 (corresponding with GNOME
2.20) and I've spotted, that during the GNOME packages update all the
BR-s and R-s of gnome packages were upped to 2.20 line.
The question is -- Is this necessary? I mean I've looked into
evolution's configure.in and it seems i
Dnia 19-09-2007, Śr o godzinie 22:22 +0200, Rafał Cygnarowski
napisał(a):
>
> If an individual or organization is creating a Community Edition of Mozilla
> Firefox or Thunderbird, it must use the names "Firefox Community Edition"
> or "Thunderbird Community Edition" to identify this software. T
Dnia 07-08-2007, Wt o godzinie 23:00 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> For yum fans: such change in rpm alone probably won't solve anything
> with yum, as their maintainers are unlinkely to implement this
> (just like Suggests)...
I belive we should not care bout that. I think if we already think
Dnia 07-08-2007, Wt o godzinie 21:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> > AFAIR current vim has only perl enabled by default.
> > Or only perl was enabled some time ago...
>
> So maybe let's enable perl and python, keeping tcl and ruby disabled
> until someone proves that (s)he really needs them.
Dnia 19-07-2007, Cz o godzinie 16:21 +0200, Mariusz Mazur napisał(a):
> We don't have anything for storing and browsing through hardware profiles and
> the website in the subject looks all webish2.0 and colorfull and has round
> edges. If someone could get through the software, package it and may
Dnia 21-06-2007, Cz o godzinie 22:05 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
> Currently it's called as:
>
> os.system('%s.stat/bin/createrepo --cache %s/tmp/createrepo %s%s/%s/RPMS' %
> (ftp_dir,home,ftp_dir,tree,arch))
Well, as noted it uses cache. I can't make anything
Dnia 17-06-2007, N o godzinie 22:02 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> But the original question was: do particular language support overhead is
> worth its benefits?
> Are there already some packaged or custom vim addons which need all these
> languages?
1. I use vim to develop python code and th
Dnia 17-06-2007, N o godzinie 17:55 +0100, wrobell napisał(a):
> imho it should be off by default. if one wants fat vim, then please create
> vim-enahnced/vim-fat/whatever packages.
1. What is fat? perl is fat for me, python not and it was on by default
2. Vim static is the choice for slim soluti
Dnia 24-05-2007, czw o godzinie 17:43 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe napisał(a):
> i'm +1
>
+1 - especially as poldek can make use of Suggest macro.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mai
Dnia 16-05-2007, śro o godzinie 08:45 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
>
> DON'T use ,,th is development'' as excuse for such things please.
>
Yea, maybe You're right. Nevertheless I couldn't have tested it in the
first place, that's why I've asked the RFC.
http://svn.pld-linux.org/cgi
Dnia 15-05-2007, wto o godzinie 22:33 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki napisał(a):
> Please stop changing geninitrd to your liking without performing
> sanity checks FIRST.
>
A the initramfs was my idea in the first place I feel responsible to
respond. I'm sorry for You screwed up evening. Nevertheless ther
Dnia 14-05-2007, pon o godzinie 13:06 +0200, Jacek Konieczny napisał(a):
> If the switches were not needed, then it is good they were removed.
> Maybe they were required some time ago, but now the problem is fixed
> somewhere else (newer kernel).
Well - after answering You I've found some more ma
Dnia 14-05-2007, pon o godzinie 09:49 +0200, Jacek Konieczny napisał(a):
> And fonts and keyboard input are set right on all the text consoles? I
> doubt.
Hm - I haven't spotted any problems. What to look for?? I've got utf-8
polish terminals and all get set properly - I can read and write polish
Hi.
I've been toying around fbsplash for some time now. I've been searching
of a way to make the fbsplash's splash non-stop visible during boot.
The problem I've found is console service from kbd. Is it really needed
to switch to every console in every /sbin/open and even do
manual /sbin/switchto
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 13:17 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> Means what? I don't see vim here. As default `encoding` (internal
> setting for buffers etc) is latin1 (as I don't use gvim for anything but
> LaTeX and don't have unicode locale) it simply won't work.
So how should this work?
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 12:50 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> On Sun, Feb 18, 2007 at 12:41:04PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > put these to .vimrc and no need for meesing with spec files
> >
> > set fileencoding=iso8859-2
>
> > set fileencodings=ucs-bom,utf-8,i
Dnia 18-02-2007, nie o godzinie 11:45 +0100, Tomasz Pala napisał(a):
> I suggest adding:
>
> # vim:encoding=utf-8
>
> line to all the converted specs. Any objections?
>
+1
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.o
Dnia 15-02-2007, czw o godzinie 22:33 +0100, Michal Chruszcz napisał(a):
> #v+
> + umount /proc
> + exec switch_root /newroot /sbin/init
> switch_root: bad newroot /newroot
> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attemted to kill init!
> #v-
To jest copy-paste, czy przepisałeś ?? Bo jak copy-paste, to jak
Dnia 29-01-2007, pon o godzinie 08:34 +0100, Przemyslaw Iskra
napisał(a):
> Does it matter ? There is only one correct solution - make udev work
> properly, or copy the device at initramfs creation time (like initrd
> does).
>
Yes. Udev *does* work correctly. The problem is, that in initramfs we
Dnia 28-01-2007, nie o godzinie 22:18 +0100, Artur Frysiak napisał(a):
> root=/dev/vg1/root
>
> with initrdfs=rom works but with initramfs not.
True. I'll look into that in 3-4 days (I'm finishing my engineers
degree)
I wander, how many more such possibilities exist.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Dnia 27-01-2007, sob o godzinie 19:31 +0100, Przemyslaw Iskra
napisał(a):
> consider the attached script, simplified, and should work
Feel free to use that and commit to SVN. I've added a patch to make the
ona already being used work (I think).
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dnia 27-01-2007, sob o godzinie 18:35 +0100, Przemyslaw Iskra
napisał(a):
> semicolon is missing
hm - true - no idea how it worked for me.
> anyway, this is wrong, theck this one:
>
> echo root=0303 | awk 'BEGIN { prefix="root="; num_pattern_short =
> "[0-9][0-9][0-9]"; num_pattern = num_p
Dnia 27-01-2007, sob o godzinie 18:08 +0100, Jaroslaw Dziubek
napisał(a):
> I have a problem with pivot_root - which is not included in any
> package.
>
pivot_root is a part of busyboxes.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@l
Dnia 27-01-2007, sob o godzinie 17:28 +0100, Przemyslaw Iskra
napisał(a):
> using four digits is the standart way: root=0806 or root=0x0806,
> but if root=806 works geninitrd should be fixed
>
Yea, didn't see that 806 too, but I've made it possible for geninitrd to
understand.
Please build it f
Dnia 27-01-2007, sob o godzinie 14:58 +0100, Rafał Cygnarowski
napisał(a):
I've updated geninitrd to use /sbin/udevd (as new udev doesn't
have /sbin/udev anymore). Sent to builder and should work.
> Root is on /dev/sda6 - SATA2 disk.
I mean what is passed at boot time to kernel as parameters. F
Dnia 27-01-2007, sob o godzinie 12:50 +0100, Rafał Cygnarowski
napisał(a):
> Geninitrd from HEAD doesn't detect root partition properly. After boot I've
> got sth like "Metallica rocks!" and kernel panic consequently.
My bad - could You pass me Your boot options and partition from which
You boot
Dnia 21-01-2007, nie o godzinie 21:58 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I use SMP kernels while having a single one-core CPU. It's just damn
> > > easier to share packages among laptops.
> >
> > +1
>
> +1
>
> here, too.
>
An unsure +1, if an SMP kernel really wo
Dnia 06-01-2007, sob o godzinie 19:26 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> While building KDE4 some issues came up. First of all our Qt4 qmake is named
> different than in every other distro.
Nah - 90% of work is done. Just set QTDIR to %{_libdir}/qt4 and PATH too
$QTDI/bin:$PATH and everything wo
Dnia 02-01-2007, wto o godzinie 10:21 +0100, Cezary Krzyzanowski
napisał(a):
> Przy install -F * powitał mnie taki kwiatek:
>
Ekhmsorry - Evo gave me en before pl and I didn't see that.
Nevertheless the problem stays.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Przy install -F * powitał mnie taki kwiatek:
kdelibs-devel-3.5.5-4.x86_64 zaznaczył kdelibs-libs-3.5.5-4.x86_64 (wł.
kdelibs-libs < 9:3.5.5-2)
Something wrong, something not quite right.
Assertion 'pkg_is_marked(ictx->ts->pms, pkg) == 0' failed, mark.c:101
Please report this bug to <[EMAIL PROTECT
Dnia 27-12-2006, śro o godzinie 15:19 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> OK, It's working now, nearly working...
>
> Progress is broken, /etc/init.d/functions lack support for it, I'll try to
> fix
> it today.
Not my business till I finish my engineers project (end of February).
> initrd with
Dnia 26-12-2006, wto o godzinie 21:39 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> Hmm, I had runlevel 3 set in inittab but added 5 as a kernel parameter, so it
> boots with gdm. I'll try the -desktop kernel tomorrow, maybe it's just the
> LINUX_2_6 branch...
>
No - what parameters is used to boot in in
Dnia 24-12-2006, nie o godzinie 21:04 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> One more flaw - initramfs seems to ignore the initlevel parameter passed to
> the kernel from grub (setting it in /etc/inittab fixes the problem though)
Hm - I haven't noticed that running normal init requires any parameter.
Dnia 19-12-2006, wto o godzinie 23:24 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> root=0303 (tried /dev/hda3 also) I'll check the rest tomorrow, I can barely
> see the screen now :/
>
I've generated initrd almost identical as Your. I've booted it
successfully with 2.6.18.4_laptop-0.3 kernel.
[EMAIL PR
Dnia 19-12-2006, wto o godzinie 23:12 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> Dnia wtorek, 19 grudnia 2006 22:18, Cezary Krzyzanowski napisał:
> > 1. Is the generated image initrd, or initramfs (should be the later).
>
> With latest geninitrd from th-test:
Ok - so it seems to be initr
Dnia 19-12-2006, wto o godzinie 22:03 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> It would be a good idea, there's no need for an rw root while initrd is
> running, it's set by rc-scripts after checking the partition.
You miss the point - I didn't include mountintg rootfs rw as a feature,
I've omitted th
Dnia 19-12-2006, wto o godzinie 20:21 +0100, Łukasz Jernaś napisał(a):
> Hello.
>
> I can't get my system to work with geninitrd-8103-1
> rc-scripts fail when trying to check my root filesystem, because it's mounted
> read-write already.
rc-scripts?? I didn't touch rc-scripts at all. I could hav
Dnia 10-12-2006, nie o godzinie 00:41 +0100, Cezary Krzyzanowski
napisał(a):
> Ok these changes *should* make possible proper initramfs start with both
> udev on and off (I'm using udev, but I've also tested without and it
> seems to work)
>
Ok - so finished - works.
I&#x
Dnia 13-12-2006, śro o godzinie 09:17 +0100, Paweł Sikora napisał(a):
> glen, if you want such typedefs use /dev/brain,
> include and pass -mmmx to cflags.
We aren't a group of folk screaming at each other in the middle of a
field. Please use /dev/courtsy next time.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Dnia 11-12-2006, pon o godzinie 15:37 +0100, Jacek Konieczny napisał(a):
> Do you have /sys mounted in the initramfs before starting udev?
Yea - both mounted (/proc and /sys) - double checked that with sh while
boot.
BTW - I should have everything configured by geninitrd to make udev run
- right
Today I've smoked my first 'serious' sh script, making another script
(linuxrc). Now I feel what webdevelopers must feel like.
Ok these changes *should* make possible proper initramfs start with both
udev on and off (I'm using udev, but I've also tested without and it
seems to work)
The generated
> Dont bother with him, he's not reading devel-en.
Hm - someone did tell him bout thease mails, so he 'fixed' (as nothing
was broken) the spec.
I'm working currently on iceweasel 1.5.0.7-g2 and just after I'll make
binary FF 2.0
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
"Fear leads to anger, anger leads to hate, ha
Dnia 25-10-2006, śro o godzinie 14:50 +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
> On Wednesday 25 October 2006 14:41, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> > what was wrong merging first from DEVEL?
> >
> > work duplication really sucks!
> >
> + this way is wrong according to mozilla people and we ALREADY had probl
Dnia 20-09-2006, śro o godzinie 12:43 +0200, Tomasz Mateja napisał(a):
> According to license we can name it f.ex. pldswitfox or switfox-PLD and
> make it distributable :)
Yes - if we make it build from their sources, which isn't as easy as it
seems. I've failed to build it from spec, by hand or
45 matches
Mail list logo
