[rc-scripts] LVM + LUKS = fail

2010-06-29 Thread Radosław Zieliński
I have a LVM volume group, created over three logical partitions: # fdisk -l /dev/sda | grep LVM /dev/sda52676875448829536 8e Linux LVM /dev/sda68755 1483348829536 8e Linux LVM /dev/sda7 14834 1945737142248+ 8e Linux

Re: packages: perl-Clutter-GStreamer/perl-Clutter-GStreamer.spec -

2010-06-08 Thread Radosław Zieliński
2010/6/8 : > RPM's Release is and have to be our internal number, not the upstream one. > Any "release" that is external to us have to go to the "Version" field in > some way. Well, that's not how we've been doing things so far. betaX, alphaX, rcX, snapshots, whatever -- it all usually goes to R

Re: repcached

2010-05-06 Thread Radosław Zieliński
2010/5/6 Elan Ruusamäe : > what you think about repcached http://repcached.lab.klab.org/ > should we create new package, or just patch our memcached? New. Leave this kind of patching to the upstream. You can't get this functionality without a performance hit. Anyway, if you need to replicate you

Re: packages: flvtool2/flvtool2.spec, flvtool2/flvtool2-ruby19.patch (NEW) - up...

2010-05-01 Thread Radosław Zieliński
2010/5/1 Radosław Zieliński : [...] >  if RUBY_VERSION < "1.9" Oops: this should have been ">=", instead of "<". ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: packages: flvtool2/flvtool2.spec, flvtool2/flvtool2-ruby19.patch (NEW) - up...

2010-05-01 Thread Radosław Zieliński
On 1 May 2010 06:58, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > However this breaks the package build on ruby 1.8 systems. Is there an > acceptable way to mark a patch in the spec for inclusion only if the > host system is running a certain version of a package? Writing portable patches is the preferred solution.

Re: SPECS: postgresql.spec - updated pg_ctl-fix patch is back (neede...

2008-03-19 Thread Radosław Zieliński
esql with non-default unix socket path) FYI: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-09/msg00760.php (Yes, their reasons are utterly pointless and originate from "works on my RH", but meh.) -- Radosław Zieliński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: SPECS: python-xmlrpc.spec - I can be python-aware: arch-independen...

2005-07-05 Thread Radosław Zieliński
> Author: saq Date: Tue Jul 5 19:18:51 2005 GMT > Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - I can be python-aware: arch-independent dir, minor fixes No, you can't. If it's supposed to be arch-independent, the package should be noarch and *.p

Re: SPECS: python-py-xmlrpc.spec (NEW) - new, useful for gnue-*

2005-07-05 Thread Radosław Zieliński
On 7/5/05, Paweł Sakowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 21:09 +0200, radek wrote: > > +#Summary(pl): > Missing. Low priority, I don't care. > > +Requires:python > It doesn't, only python-libs. And use %pyrequires_eq . Plus, xmlrpclib > is imported but not required (BTW, d