On 06/10/2010 03:11 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On Thursday 10 June 2010 13:46:57 tommat wrote:
>> %ifarch sparc64
>> sparc64-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)?
>> -sparcv8-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)?
>> -sparcv9-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)?
>> %endif
>> -%ifarch sparcv9
>> -sparcv8-[^-]*-[Ll]inux(-gnu)?
>> +%ifarch sp
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Monday 10 November 2008 23:39, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>> Please fix sorting, you broke it.
>
> and which collation should be used for sorting?
>
> (to tommat) and when sorting leave "vim" line somewhere as first or as last:
> vim:encoding=utf-8
>
Moved manually REA
adamg pisze:
> Author: adamgDate: Sun May 18 16:12:29 2008 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - new
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>antargis.spec (1.4 -> 1.5) , archivemail.spec (1.19 -> 1.20) , builder
> (1.557 -> 1.558) , e
wywala sie na:
rm -f ../../lib/libxalan-c.so && \
ln -fs libxalan-c.so.110.0 ../../lib/libxalan-c.so
rm -f ../../lib/libxalan-c.so.110 && \
ln -fs libxalan-c.so.110.0 ../../lib/libxalan-c.so.110
sparc-pld-linux-g++ -O2 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include-Wall -fPIC -DLINU
Marcin Krol pisze:
>> hawk did. and the biggest problem was that the data does not fit to disk.
>
> AFAIR there was just few KB left on some disk. Also I don't have
> installer build environment anymore.
Pity, but I'll try to make some.
>> upgrading disks, would mean that disks should use also
Tomasz Pala pisze:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 01:01:16 +0300, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
>
>> stty: invalid argument `-utf8'
>> Try `stty --help' for more information.
>>[ DONE ]
>> there's no 'locale' command invocation i can find from
Thank you guys for discussion. I don't agree with some points but such
response means PLD is still alive :-)
This makes me remember the gold PLD rule: SOD#1 :)
Anyway can anyone look at this logs?
Who was making those floppies? Maybe there is some possibility to
upgrade there rpm and/or poldek t
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008 22:03, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>>> and kernel update is needed to let ac live a little longer. as there's
>>> need to support newer hardware. it was considered dead already time it
>>> was released. and some major
Adam Golebiowski pisze:
> As above - it's all about new features, like new hardware, powertop, vmsplice
> exploit support... I do not need powertop on my server, but would like to
> play a bit with it on my laptop. And no, I do not want (-ENOTIME) to migrate
> to Ti or Th.
I Still dont understan
Patryk Zawadzki pisze:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 9:14 PM, Tomasz Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Patryk Zawadzki pisze:
>> > Not everything and especially not some old floppy installation method :)
>> Why not? Is it part of AC or not? If not - please remo
Jakub Bogusz pisze:
>> What are the super-hiper features with new release of kernel??
>> Remeber - no xorg - no compiz - no fun - kernel upgrade wont help
>> Old glibc - new kernel - compatibility emulated - what new features?
>
> Usability with current hardware. Disk controllers, Ethernet adapter
Patryk Zawadzki pisze:
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Tomasz Mateja <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
>>>> Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox
>> >
>> > no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa&
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>>> and if you definition of stable is old packages, why bother upgrading
>>> packages from ac-updates afterall?
>> updates was intended to security, bugfix updates. whats the difference
>&
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008 21:25, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>>> and instead of living out your feelings, report bugs what is wrong with
>>> 2.6.22 kernel (in lists or http://bugs.pld-linux.org/). 2.6.16 is at
>>> least three years old kernel. upstre
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
>> Try yourself in vmware or virtualbox
>
> no i won't. if you want something fixed, share 'rpm -qa' (answer to
> question "what was installed afterall")
>
Ok I'll prepare detailed report but I don't like your attitude as a RM.
Whats the difference between grey developer and
Elan Ruusamäe pisze:
> On Wednesday 09 April 2008 20:33, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>> Translated:
>>
>> I've tried to check what hurts AC:
>> 1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the
>> SysVinit package wasn't installed - result no
Translated:
I've tried to check what hurts AC:
1. During the instalation from bootdisk-net, basic instalation, the
SysVinit package wasn't installed - result nonbooting system, when
manually installed - it works
2. Upgrade AC, it fails when upgrading rpm with the message of missing
lzma, when
Jeff Johnson napisał(a):
>> D:40 0x000a 81920 -1 rw /dev/pts
>
> Ick. Smells like lots of chroots.
>
I have 2 chroots on this machine 32 and 64bit.
> ...
>> LZDIO: 244 reads, 8557275660681216 total bytes in 0.668983 secs
>
> Hmmm, looks like a int32 vs size
I still cannot manage to get rpm at sparc64 working with rpms compressed
with lzma (f.ex. noarch from our ftp) those compressed with bzip working
without any problems, rpmbuild produces good lzma compressed rpms. So
problem is only with extracting.
simple gdb log: http://rg4.polsl.pl/pldsparc/r
Tomasz Mateja napisał(a):
> wrobell napisał(a):
>> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>>> Since the db4.6 rpm on sparc seems not to work:
>>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm --rebuilddb
>>> Bus error
>>> [EMAIL
wrobell napisał(a):
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 11:45:08AM +0200, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>> Since the db4.6 rpm on sparc seems not to work:
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm --rebuilddb
>> Bus error
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm --rebuilddb
>> rpmdb: unabl
Since the db4.6 rpm on sparc seems not to work:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm --rebuilddb
Bus error
[EMAIL PROTECTED] RPMS]# rpm --rebuilddb
rpmdb: unable to join the environment
error: db4 error(11) from dbenv->open: Resource temporarily unavailable
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - R
Jeff Johnson napisał(a):
> On Jun 18, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Tomasz Mateja wrote:
>
>> Jeff Johnson napisał(a):
>> One issue remaining on my sparc64 - I cannot use
>> %_binary_payloadw9.lzdio.
>> When I build package with lzdio I have:
>
Jeff Johnson napisał(a):
>
>
Ok with this patch and without pie stuff on sparc64.
One issue remaining on my sparc64 - I cannot use
%_binary_payloadw9.lzdio.
When I build package with lzdio I have:
Upgrading...
1:autoconf ###
[100%
Tomasz Mateja napisał(a):
> Jeff Johnson napisał(a):
>> This is likely the -pie linkage and -fpie compilation, new in rpm-4.4.9.
>>
>> Remove PIE compilation/linkage is the easy fix.
>>
>> Upgrading binutils and/or rewriting rpm code may help.
>>
>> 73
Jeff Johnson napisał(a):
> This is likely the -pie linkage and -fpie compilation, new in rpm-4.4.9.
>
> Remove PIE compilation/linkage is the easy fix.
>
> Upgrading binutils and/or rewriting rpm code may help.
>
> 73 de Jeff
>
removed and it's built right now, btw binutils are current.
--
T.
Already mentioned on devel-pl:
http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-pl/2007-June/141330.html
sparc64-pld-linux-gcc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -mcpu=ultrasparc
-fno-strict-aliasing -gdwarf-2 -g2 -fPIC -DPIC -D_GNU_SOURCE
-D_REENTRANT -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wstrict-prototyp
Adam Gołębiowski wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:50:33PM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Th production builders are currently on-hold due to missing th-i486 machine
>> (we lost it unfortunately). Only test builds are allowed at this moment.
>>
>> We are looking for a new mac
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz wrote:
> Piotr Skwarna wrote:
>> Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaĹ?(a):
>>> Piotr Skwarna wrote:
>>>
Andrzej Krzysztofowicz napisaÄšďż˝(a):
> Elan =?iso-8859-1?q?Ruusam=E4e?= wrote:
>
>
>> ftp.iso.pld-linux.org is not answering
>>
glen wrote:
> Author: glen Date: Tue Sep 19 12:55:42 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - update License
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>swiftfox.spec (1.1 -> 1.2)
>
> Diffs:
>
> ==
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# chmod 644 /etc/*.env
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 211 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/csh.env
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 213 Sep 5 19:43 /etc/profile.env
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# env-update
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# ls /etc/*.env -la
-rw--- 1 root root 211 Sep
Tomasz Mateja wrote:
> glen wrote:
>
>>Author: glen Date: Tue Jul 18 16:13:57 2006 GMT
>>Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
>> Log message:
>>- don't install apache config to lighttpd
>>
>> Files
glen wrote:
> Author: glen Date: Tue Jul 18 16:13:57 2006 GMT
> Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD
> Log message:
> - don't install apache config to lighttpd
>
> Files affected:
> SPECS:
>nocc.spec (1.33 -> 1.34)
>
Such example exists in templat
33 matches
Mail list logo
