On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 09:46:54PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 20:26 +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> > On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > > Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 11:54 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
> > > napisał(a):
> >
Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 20:26 +0100, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a):
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> > Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 11:54 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
> > napisał(a):
> > > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > > But i
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 08:21:01PM +0100, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 11:54 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
> napisał(a):
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > > But it tests only IFS compliance.
> > > What about all other functionality?
> > Haven
Dnia 08-11-2006, śro o godzinie 11:54 +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz
napisał(a):
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> > But it tests only IFS compliance.
> > What about all other functionality?
> Haven't seen tests for other functionality.
Should we aim at perfect POSIX compat
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 11:49, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:29:51AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:37, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> > > Well, there is only bash left as a option for /bin/sh it seems ;-)
> >
> > Interesting test sui
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 11:29:51AM +0100, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:37, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
>
> > Well, there is only bash left as a option for /bin/sh it seems ;-)
>
> Interesting test suite:
> http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/blog.html/nb_20050320_1408.h
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 10:37, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Well, there is only bash left as a option for /bin/sh it seems ;-)
Interesting test suite:
http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/blog.html/nb_20050320_1408.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ /bin/bash ifs.sh
# tests 6856 passed 6856 failed 0
/bi
We use tons of brace expansions (like man{1,5}) in our specs. Unfortunately
there is a problem since POSIX/SUSv3 shell specification doesn't say a word
about {} expansion. What now - should {} in spec files be forbidden?
I was thinking about switching from buggy and unmaintained pdksh to some o
