On 2015-07-27 12:29, Łukasz Maśko wrote:
Dnia poniedziałek, 27 lipca 2015 08:11:25 Jacek Konieczny pisze:
[...]
And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly instead
of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its own,
though probably without x32 support.
Just
Dnia poniedziałek, 27 lipca 2015 08:11:25 Jacek Konieczny pisze:
[...]
> And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly instead
> of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its own,
> though probably without x32 support.
Just to make sure, if I get it right - does
On 2015-07-27 08:47, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 27.07.2015 09:43, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
how would pld name the package?
a) openjdk.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec
That works well in any intermediate stages and worked well for
sun-java* and icedtea*.
there's openjdk.spec already. wha
On 27.07.2015 09:43, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
how would pld name the package?
a) openjdk.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec
That works well in any intermediate stages and worked well for
sun-java* and icedtea*.
there's openjdk.spec already. what to do with it?
https://github.com/pld-l
On 2015-07-27 08:35, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly
instead of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its
own, though probably without x32 support.
how would pld name the package?
On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly
instead of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its
own, though probably without x32 support.
how would pld name the package?
a) openjdk.spec?
b) openjdk8.spec?
in
On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly
instead of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its
own, though probably without x32 support.
didn't even know OpenJDK and IcedTea are different things :)
--
glen
_
On 27.07.2015 09:11, Jacek Konieczny wrote:
And a reminder: the oracle-java7 and oracle-java8 packages we have in
PLD are not legally distributable – the old Sun license 'for
distributions' is gone and distributing Oracle Java with a Linux
distribution is not allowed by its current license.
On 2015-07-26 20:56, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
anyone working on IcedTea8?
None I know of, but it is time to package Java 8.
And probably it might be a better idea to build OpenJDK directly instead
of using IcedTea8. Current OpenJDK should be buildable on its own,
though probably without x32 supp
