On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
> >
> > Kernel build for non-PAE i686 is what I want.
>
> Will be there today on i686, but only for head, so no vserver.
Thanks.
___
pld-deve
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Witold Filipczyk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> > TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
> >
> > Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
> >
> > Rationale:
> >
> > It's increasingly more problematic to get ever
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 20:22:01 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> If we have i686 arch we need to support i686 CPUs, not a random subset.
We don't "need" to do anything. SSE2 is 13 years old now (and available
for 11 years in AMD), I haven't seen unsupported CPUs in years.
Hardware produced in tha
On Tue, 30 Dec 2014, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> +1 to abandoning i486 in current state (keeping last packages on FTP).
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 21:48:03 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> >> Specifically:
> >>Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
> >> sse2?
> >
> >
+1 to abandoning i486 in current state (keeping last packages on FTP).
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 21:48:03 +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>> Specifically:
>> Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
>> sse2?
>
> No 32bit AMD CPU has this. So, no, you can't do it uncon
On 15/12/14 21:01, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
>
> Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
+1
Compiling IcedTea (Java) for i486 has been always problematic and took much
longer than compiling it for other archs (hours of difference).
Greets
On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
>
>> I'm more interested in the lowest common denominator Intel architecture.
>>
>> Specifically:
>> Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
>> sse2?
>
> No 32bit
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
> I'm more interested in the lowest common denominator Intel architecture.
>
> Specifically:
> Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
> sse2?
No 32bit AMD CPU has this. So, no, you can't do it unconditionally.
We're
I'm more interested in the lowest common denominator Intel architecture.
Specifically:
Can RPM assume sse2 instructions and optimize digests/crypto to use
sse2?
73 de Jeff
On Dec 15, 2014, at 3:01 PM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for re
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 09:01:58PM +0100, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
>
> Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
>
> Rationale:
>
> It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some
> packages explicitly say "no" to t
W dniu 15.12.2014 o 21:01, Jan Rękorajski pisze:
TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
Rationale:
It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some
packages explicitly say "no" to this arch, some require hacks
TL;DR Future of i486 is bleak, it's a strong candidate for removal.
Proposal: remove i486 from Th.
Rationale:
It's increasingly more problematic to get everything built on i486, some
packages explicitly say "no" to this arch, some require hacks and
strange workarounds, and other just silently fa
12 matches
Mail list logo
