On 11.06.2024 09:41, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Jun 2024, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 05 May 2024, Jan Palus wrote:
> >
> > > Looks like new entries don't appear in freshness report
> > > (http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness) although
> > > interestingly old items
On Sat, 08 Jun 2024, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Sun, 05 May 2024, Jan Palus wrote:
>
> > Looks like new entries don't appear in freshness report
> > (http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness) although
> > interestingly old items that made it to the list disappear after they
> > were
On Sun, 05 May 2024, Jan Palus wrote:
> Looks like new entries don't appear in freshness report
> (http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness) although
> interestingly old items that made it to the list disappear after they
> were sent to builders.
The problem is that SPECS pseudorepo
Looks like new entries don't appear in freshness report
(http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness) although
interestingly old items that made it to the list disappear after they
were sent to builders.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
On Sat, 08 Jan 2022, Jan Palus wrote:
> Report at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness stopped
> receiving updates despite timestamp claiming it was ran recently.
> For example uriparser or libsigsegv are missing.
Fixed.
Client repo desync.
--
Jan Rękorajski|
Report at http://ep09.pld-linux.org/~pldth/qa.php?q=freshness stopped
receiving updates despite timestamp claiming it was ran recently.
For example uriparser or libsigsegv are missing.
___
pld-devel-en mailing list
pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org
