Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-24 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 14:26:22 +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > If you see better method right now - you are welcome. Of course - leave this bash completion code in main package (I'm strictly againt using bash at all, but it doesn't bother even me) and do not care at all about directory owner

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-24 Thread Jeff Johnson
On Aug 24, 2011, at 8:26 AM, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: > > Maybe each file in filesystem? :P > That won't work: one needs to put every byte in a virtualized environment with full hardware enforced isolation to please everyone. And RPM will *still* have extraordinary abilities to be able to con

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-24 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: > >> > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires > >> >(prefered method). > >> This is overkill. > > why? It's nice, IMHO. Wan't some completion? Install proper package. > 1. one needs to know he wants the completion - as the

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-24 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 21:42:43 +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: >> > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires >> >(prefered method). >> This is overkill. > > why? It's nice, IMHO. > Wan't some completion? Install proper package. 1. one needs to know he wants t

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: > >> %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} > >> > >> The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is > >> installed, resulting in an rpm error. > > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires > >(prefered meth

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Tomasz Pala
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 17:01:37 +0200, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: >> %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} >> >> The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is installed, >> resulting in an rpm error. > > 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires >

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Caleb Maclennan wrote: > >> +Requires:    bash-completion > > > > Are you sure? > > IMvHO it shouldn't be more than "Suggests"... if any... > No I'm not sure how to handle this, but it does provide a file for use > by bash-completion: > > %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{na

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, caleb wrote: > Author: calebDate: Tue Aug 23 11:10:00 2011 GMT > Module: packages Tag: HEAD > Log message: > - Up to 0.56 > > Files affected: > packages/etckeeper: >etckeeper.spec (1.5 -> 1.6) [...] > # - %{py_sitesc