On 24.04.2016 22:42, Jeff Johnson wrote:
For a national distro with a dominant locale, its also possible to
reconfigure to eliminate the C locale, and put the pl translation
into header content (as if it were the "C" locale)
pld is not polish linux distribution no more, it's pld linux
On Apr 24, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 24.04.2016 22:23, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> When was the last time a distro rebuilt a package to correct a spelling
>> error typo in, say,
>> the Swahili translation?
>
> fedora rebuilds *all* packages for each release, so each release will
On 24.04.2016 22:23, Jeff Johnson wrote:
When was the last time a distro rebuilt a package to correct a spelling error
typo in, say,
the Swahili translation?
fedora rebuilds *all* packages for each release, so each release will
have whatever translations were added to .spec. altho i don't
On Apr 24, 2016, at 10:25 AM, Jeff Johnson wrote:
...
>
> I think that I18N could (and should) be done better in RPM. Meanwhile
> devising a transparent
> "legacy compatible" retrofit for RPM_I18NSTRING_TYPE is/was the necessary
> first step to attempting
> a better implementation.
>
I
On Apr 24, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>
>> There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>>
>>
>> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
>>
>> This addresses the following issues:
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Jeff Johnson wrote:
> There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>
>
> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
>
> This addresses the following issues:
> 1) mongoc.h needed #include to rebuild with PLD
On 28.03.2016 19:20, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Is there any reason I shouldn't release rpm-5.4.16 this week?
i don't think anybody from pld has tested it.
i've only compile-tested it, and two patches still need updating.
--
glen
___
pld-devel-en mailing
On Mar 23, 2016, at 5:37 PM, Elan Ruusamäe wrote:
> On 22.03.2016 01:44, Jeff Johnson wrote:
>> There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
>>
>>
>> http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
>
> it compiled, so committed [1]
>
Good.
On 22.03.2016 01:44, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
it compiled, so committed [1]
rpm-dont-copy-descriptive-tags.patch [2] needs more work to apply, needs
On 22.03.2016 01:44, Jeff Johnson wrote:
There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
yay. textfields now appear okay in your rpm file:
➔ rpm -qpi ../rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
Name
There is a 3rd snapshot release of rpm-5.4.16 now available at
http://rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/SNAPSHOT//rpm-5.4.16-0.20160321.src.rpm
This addresses the following issues:
1) mongoc.h needed #include to rebuild with PLD configuration
2) build with or without in "system.h"
11 matches
Mail list logo