Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-09-01 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 1 Sep 2011, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it) [...] -%attr(755,root,root)

Re: packages: util-linux/util-linux.spec - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (Sys...

2011-08-31 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 31 Aug 2011, arekm wrote: Author: arekmDate: Wed Aug 31 20:06:20 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - rel 4; don't include mountpoint (SysVinit contains it) [...] -%attr(755,root,root) /bin/mountpoint

Re: packages: xorg-xserver-server/xorg-xserver-server.spec - xorg-driver-video ...

2011-08-26 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011, glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Fri Aug 26 03:42:59 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - xorg-driver-video virtual for video drivers - release 1 [...] +# Requires at least one video driver to run, see

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-24 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires (prefered method). This is overkill. why? It's nice, IMHO. Wan't some completion? Install proper package. 1. one needs to know he wants the completion - as they exist for a

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, caleb wrote: Author: calebDate: Tue Aug 23 11:10:00 2011 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - Up to 0.56 Files affected: packages/etckeeper: etckeeper.spec (1.5 - 1.6) [...] # -

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Caleb Maclennan wrote: +Requires:    bash-completion Are you sure? IMvHO it shouldn't be more than Suggests... if any... No I'm not sure how to handle this, but it does provide a file for use by bash-completion: %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} The

Re: packages: etckeeper/etckeeper.spec - Up to 0.56

2011-08-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Tomasz Pala wrote: %{_sysconfdir}/bash_completion.d/%{name} The folder for this does not exist unless bash-completion is installed, resulting in an rpm error. 1. Make separate subpackage with completion files with proper requires (prefered method). This is

Re: ssh: send/accept GIT_* env vars

2011-05-04 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 4 May 2011, Kacper Kornet wrote: What is the reason that GIT_ variables are copied by ssh to remote session? I mean the following line in our default /etc/ssh/ssh_config. AcceptEnv LANG LC_* LANGUAGE TZ GIT_* I have just discovered that it break at least one feature in

Re: rc-scripts-user

2011-02-01 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011, Przemyslaw Iskra wrote: rc-scripts-user / userscripts allows normal users to schedule and execute tasks on system startup and shutdown. Please test and comment. Once it gets on any production system it will be hard to change interface without breaking user configuration.

Re: [PATCH] NetworkManager ModemManager

2010-09-27 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: I think we should give you chance to work on your own account. me: +1 +1 Anyone else? :) do you know, that if you say +1, you must mentor his commits, i.e correct him and explain things, not just say yes Is it so hard to make search the list

Re: packages: cairo/cairo-link.patch, cairo/cairo.spec - 1.10.0 - merged from d...

2010-09-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Jakub Bogusz wrote: - modify libtool not to use *.la for dynamic linking and keep them in -devel Lets suppose we will have modification like that. Will mainstream accept it? If yes - lets do it. -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl

Re: packages: cairo/cairo-link.patch, cairo/cairo.spec - 1.10.0 - merged from d...

2010-09-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 18 Sep 2010, Tomasz Pala wrote: - remove all library *.la and -static packages +1 - this also simplifies builds and releases storage. Do we have any FTP stats on *-static downloads? If noone uses them there's no point in wasting resources. Wrong. I've used few times

Re: packages: php/php.spec - fix timezone setup in php.ini - there's nothing to...

2010-08-26 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Thu Aug 26 17:08:31 2010 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - fix timezone setup in php.ini - there's nothing to ldconfig Files affected: packages/php: php.spec (1.892 -

Re: [PATCH] NetworkManager ModemManager

2010-08-13 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 10 Aug 2010, Przemo Firszt wrote: List of changes: - Add polkit option to ModemManager configure, - Add ifcfg-rh plugin to NetworkManager, - Add new config file for NM and remove obsolete one, - Add Suggests: ModemManager mobile-broadband-provider-info to NetworkManager.spec

Re: devel-hints-pl.txt thread

2010-06-04 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 2 Jun 2010, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: as seen by google translate: http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/pipermail/pld-devel-pl/2010-June/thread.html#start it's not 1st of april to do those jokes, is it? hint: the source: http://translate.google.com/#pl|et|Pawel%20Golaszewski ROTFL! :D --

Re: devel-hints-pl.txt thread

2010-06-04 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
is the new Pawel Golaszewski world-wide? My second identity. :D -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround

Re: Native upstart scripts

2010-05-04 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: I think Upstart support should be implemented as an option, coexisting with current solution, so the administrator may choose what he prefers and even use init.d for some services and upstart for other. I was hoping for eventually dropping rc

Re: Native upstart scripts

2010-05-04 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Jacek Konieczny wrote: Maybe we could make /etc/init.d a directory with symlinks to /etc/rc.d/init.d or the upstart wrapper, depending on what is used to handle the service? see how ubuntu made this. Every service is in that directory, some are links. I can see how does

Re: $HOME of system users like nobody or stats

2010-03-25 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: mount.davfs (provided by davfs2 package) does not allow non-root user to mount filesystem into another users home directory. Problem is that home directory of nobody and stats users (both provided by setup package) is /. I would like to change

Re: packages: mysql/mysql.spec, mysql/my.cnf (NEW) - add default ~/.my.cnf via ...

2009-12-21 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009, glen wrote: Author: glen Date: Mon Dec 21 14:52:55 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - add default ~/.my.cnf via /etc/skel [...] +cp -a %{SOURCE14} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/skel/.my.cnf [...]

Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

2009-12-04 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 4 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: _Maybe_ he shouldn't do this... But it's done now and we shouldn't reverse it. [...] but it's obvious that this change MUST be reverted in Ac. This line is frozen and there is NO PLACE for ANY changes, especially so invasive. I can agree with that.

Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

2009-12-02 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: you're writing of yourself in third tense? what is this letter about? About broken PHP. Not by me. everybody is welcome to fix packages and stbr them to builders, there's even !stbr bot on irc for really everyone(?). There are already two votes

Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

2009-12-02 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: package spliting itself is ok, IMO. I don't really care if it's shared or not. I do care about working apps. The one who broke them and fellowship he gathers should do that BEFORE STBR. Although it definitely is bad idea. Let me repeat from -pl:

Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

2009-12-02 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: Although it definitely is bad idea. Let me repeat from -pl: I don't know a single installation not using sessions I do. Not only one. What's the traffic volume? 2 of them - minimal 2 of them - big. and so limited in resources that it makes a

Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

2009-12-02 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: What's the footprint? I didn't checked but every php module loaded causes memory usage increase of each apache process. Crazy but it's the way apache works. [...] There are arguments to make these modules as separate ones. Yes, memory

Re: Aktualne PHP powinno wymagać aktualnego pcre, problem z php-eaccelerator

2009-12-02 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009, Wojciech Błaszkowski wrote: There is REALY a lots of packages / scripts / what_ever wich requres session. IMO excluding session to single package is NOT a good idea. goal is to write down deps in pkgs. too bad original spec developer didn't care writing down

Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO

2009-11-09 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 9 Nov 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: Author: bluesDate: Thu Oct 29 08:15:20 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - TODO Files affected: packages/secpanel: secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO

Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO

2009-11-08 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: It can be packaged as doc. Easy to do. Packaging it and putting as Source will fix previous issue... That would be really a mess. Consider conflicts with shipped TODO files. TODO-PLD, PLD-TODO, whatever... Debian uses

Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO

2009-11-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 6 Nov 2009, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Author: bluesDate: Thu Oct 29 08:15:20 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - TODO Files affected: packages/secpanel: secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO (NONE - 1.1)

Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO

2009-11-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Jan Rekorajski wrote: Author: bluesDate: Thu Oct 29 08:15:20 2009 GMT Module: packages Tag: HEAD Log message: - TODO Files affected: packages/secpanel: secpanel.spec (1.31 - 1.32) , TODO (NONE -

Re: packages: secpanel/secpanel.spec, secpanel/TODO (NEW) - TODO

2009-11-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Tomasz Pala wrote: Compilation errors, whatever. Have never encoutered one. no? Look at openoffice.org.spec. Good luck. NOTE, TODO, MAYBE TODO, I never liked long TODO's in spec headers. It's only noise. I never liked multiple %desc or subpackages. Just get used to it.

Re: xz vs. lzma

2009-06-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: xz has replaced lzma, Provides/Obsoletes it and install symlink lzma that points to xz. Unfortunatelly these programs are not compatibile. xz is unable to decompress file compressed with lzma. First of all - ask xz developers what they will do.

Re: xz vs. lzma

2009-06-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: xz has replaced lzma, Provides/Obsoletes it and install symlink lzma that points to xz. Unfortunatelly these programs are not compatibile. xz is unable to decompress file compressed with lzma. First of all - ask xz developers what they will

Re: packages: util-vserver/util-vserver.spec, util-vserver/TODO (NEW) - move TO...

2009-05-13 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Wednesday 13 May 2009 13:44:38 blues wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.225 2009/05/13 10:44:33 blues +- move TODO to separate file why? i liked the otherwise it's 1. in spec file, always around when you edit the file 3. nobody really goes to

[geninitrd] LVM tools

2009-04-19 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
[...] # rpm -ihv kernel-2.6.28.9-1.i686.rpm Przygotowywanie... ### [100%] 1:kernel ### [100%] geninitrd: ERROR: Can't determine LVM tools version. Please set LVMTOOLSVERSION and rerun

Re: Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?

2009-03-12 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: Whatever, but please don't invent some yet again base architecture prefixes (there is %{_target_base_arch} already). Anyway there is no need to use architecture name in %{_libdir} subdirectory (multilib is already handled by different

Re: Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?

2009-03-12 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, Radoslaw Zielinski wrote: Why not try change it to something less problematic, for whole line: x86-pld-linux-thread-multi, x8664-pld-linux-thread-multi,... or maybe just arch-pld-linux-thread-multi (what about multilib in this moment?) -1: it's a major change and I

Re: Th: dropping athlon and maybe deprecating ppc?

2009-03-10 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote: I'm considering dropping athlon architecture since I see no real gain over i686. athlon would be deleted from ftp and athlon-i686 symlink created. Bad idea this way. It will destroy many systems (look at perl dirs). poldek:/all-avail rsearch

Re: Xorg requires hal daemon

2009-02-21 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Paweł Zuzelski wrote: I've installed the newest xorg and it didn't run. I've googled and found that the newest xorg needs hal daemon. http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xorg_input_hotplugging#Requirements Besides installing a supported driver, both dbus and hal

Re: PAE on i686 by default in TH

2009-02-10 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 10 Feb 2009, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Rationale: * only very old hardware like first Pentium M chips does not support hardware 3 years is very old? Come on... I have 2 laptops, both are non-PAE... Only the newest one with C2D on board is. Only the Pentium M is problem. Sonoma with

Re: SPECS: python-psycopg2.spec - Release 3. Killed nonworking mx bcond. Prepar...

2008-12-23 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: - if distro line bconds (whatever you call it) are allowed on HEAD, forbidding it, is like forbidding commits to SPECS module, i'll continue add them if i find it better than making AC-branch, Ok, but AC-branch must exist in this place. -- pozdr.

Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond

2008-12-20 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac bcond in xulrunner.spec? I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple things.

Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond

2008-12-20 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: so just to state it loud. we do allow distro line bconds like ra, ac, and ti. yep. Just not bconds - conditions. there shall be no th bconds as it is trunk forever. Byt default HEAD is for Th. OTher lines can use conditions for simplicity. -- pozdr.

Re: xulrunner.spec and ac bcond

2008-12-19 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, wrobell wrote: as i know we have ac branch for ac distro line. what's the point of ac bcond in xulrunner.spec? I think it's good direction when the difference is only in BR's or some simple configure options. There is no point in branching for so simple things. --

Re: sshd vs openvpn

2008-10-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 7 Oct 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: we had suffered one incident when one server did not came up because openvpn had server certificate which was protected by password and therefore it was waiting for password input and no other service (sshd was crucial) was not brought up until

Re: SPECS: nrss.spec (NEW) - initial

2008-08-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, uzsolt wrote: Author: uzsolt Date: Mon Aug 18 11:17:11 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - initial Files affected: SPECS: nrss.spec (NONE - 1.1) (NEW) [...] +URL:

Re: SPECS: kvm.spec - don't require external qemu, doesn't make sense.

2008-07-29 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: $Log$ +Revision 1.41 2008/07/08 21:41:32 blues +- don't require external qemu, doesn't make sense. why so? the /usr/share part is common, binary from kvm is just patched. No response = reverting. There was response. Have you tried to

Re: Split coreutils?

2008-06-26 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: however i'd had liked the change, that way i could had vserver system without any suid-root programs present. Feel free to split again and handle all the unhappy devs :) how about split, but have strict dep for some time? (this question

Re: Split coreutils?

2008-06-25 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: I'd vote for adding Suggests but somewhere else than coreutils (as it re-adds the circular dependency) or adding Requires to rc-scripts (as daemon --user foo uses su). All th builders are now broken due to split. su was used there and

Re: Split coreutils?

2008-06-25 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote: IMO there should be added R: coreutils-su in main coreutils and leave it for, let's say, 6 months. All current systems will be updated in this Don't forget about purpose of this separation - it has been done to break R loop, so this way makes no

Re: PLD-specs-TODO

2008-05-25 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 23 May 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: [pl] Co myślicie o przeniesieniu PLD-doc/PLD-specs-TODO na wiki? Lub o jakiejś integracji z wiki? Każdy wtedy mógłby dodawać propozycje nowych specy, nie tylko deweloperzy. Wiecie, nie każdy użytkownik PLD jest developerem;) Jeżeli to będzie

Re: tex in pld

2008-05-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote: Unmaintained tetex will finally dissapear from ftp... that is why I'm asking what will be lost/broken when replacing tetex with texlive... If so - better ask about incompatibilities. I was thinking about incompatibilities saying broken :) I've got

Re: tex in pld

2008-05-03 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Tomasz Pala wrote: What is the difference in functionality? I mean - what will be lost because this is most important... Why 'lost'? It's all about creating texlive* packages, not removing tetex* ones. Unmaintained tetex will finally dissapear from ftp... that is why

Re: SOURCES: lighttpd-mod_staticfile.conf - revert, put this to new pa...

2008-04-27 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sun, 27 Apr 2008, glen wrote: [...] - revert, put this to new package if really needed [...] lighttpd-mod_staticfile.conf (1.9 - 1.10) [...] -# .fcgi, .php, .pl are most often handled by mod_fastcgi or mod_cgi -static-file.exclude-extensions = ( .fcgi, .php, .pl ) +# .pl, .fcgi are

Re: SPECS: libfuse.spec - revert - it creates fuse group...

2008-04-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: Author: bluesDate: Fri Apr 18 07:43:58 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - revert - it creates fuse group... [...] +Provides: group(fuse) [...] so why not: a) add provides:

Re: [Th] emerald.spec - up to 0.7.4, add missing BuildRequires

2008-04-11 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Wed, 9 Apr 2008, kiesiu wrote: The only available emerald version on ftp (Th) doesn't want to work well with new compiz in th-test. In attachment I send a patch which upgrades emerald spec file to 0.7.4 version and adds missing BuildRequires. It works well. Please somebody with w+ access

Re: Package with make-request.sh?

2008-03-18 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: Separate spec Really simple and ugly spec. Ugly becouse: - I dont know what version it should have (now its revision number) It's fine. revision in cvs is for that purpose. - I dont know on what license it is Every spec is GPL. We can assume it's

Re: Package with make-request.sh?

2008-03-17 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Kamil Dziedzic wrote: What do you think about adding make-request.sh script to rpm-build-tools package or to separate package/spec make-request.spec? Separate spec -- pozdr. Paweł Gołaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl

Re: High Performance Enabled SSH/SCP [PSC]

2008-03-16 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/faq.php let's compile our openssh NONE Cipher support on? Hm. After upgrade Ac to openssh-4.7p1-3 with HPN putty (windows ssh client) can not connect to server. Wrote connection

Re: SPECS: wireshark.spec - ghost soname symlinks

2008-01-05 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, qboosh wrote: Author: qboosh Date: Sat Jan 5 15:08:17 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - ghost soname symlinks [...] +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost %{_libdir}/libwireshark.so.0 Shouldn't rpm generate these

Re: SPECS: wireshark.spec - ghost soname symlinks

2008-01-05 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, Elan Ruusamäe wrote: On Sat, 5 Jan 2008, qboosh wrote: Author: qboosh Date: Sat Jan 5 15:08:17 2008 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: - ghost soname symlinks [...] +%attr(755,root,root) %ghost

Re: SOURCES: logrotate.conf - do log rotation daily and keep 2 weeks.

2007-12-25 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Jakub Bogusz wrote: Author: bluesDate: Mon Dec 24 12:34:17 2007 GMT Module: SOURCES Tag: HEAD Log message: - do log rotation daily and keep 2 weeks. It's too short period :-( First of all - where's

Re: BR-s and R-s policy

2007-09-20 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Marcin Król wrote: So is this some kind of policy, to require newest packages possible at the time of upping spec? It seems so. no, it's not. It was done sometimes for things like KDE, gnome, etc to force the updates and ensure that libraries will be upgraded. --

Re: vim languages

2007-08-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
IMproved - enhanced vi editor - with TCL support vim-tiny - Vi IMproved - enhanced vi editor - compact version vim-vimoutliner - script for building an outline editor on top of Vim vimhelp-fr - Vi IMproved - Documentation files (French translation) -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski

Re: vim languages

2007-08-07 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
by default. Or only perl was enabled some time ago... -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound

Re: vim languages

2007-08-06 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
to have every type of vims in sync. Otherwise all of that will fail. - please, look at debian. They have something like that... -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono

Re: [BUG] exclude confuses /usr/lib/rpm/check-files

2007-07-22 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
... but I don't think it's good solution. Not clean, for sure. Jeff? -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic

Re: [BUG] exclude confuses /usr/lib/rpm/check-files

2007-07-22 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
. -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost and all the music is free

[BUG] exclude confuses /usr/lib/rpm/check-files

2007-07-17 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
Hello, It seems that /usr/lib/rpm/check-files is confused when in spec is used %exclude. Files excluded aren't shown as unpackaged. -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS

Re: make-3.81 in AC

2007-07-05 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
-3.81-1.src.rpm (make.spec -R HEAD ) [ac-i686:FAIL ac-i586:FAIL ac-i386:FAIL ac-athlon:FAIL ac-alpha:FAIL ac-sparc:FAIL ac-amd64:FAIL ac-ppc:FAIL] This is the reason. -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl

Re: SPECS (AC-branch): kernel-vanilla.spec - fix for PPC failing when ...

2007-06-16 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
if it's patch or sed. It's just mine 0,03€ about kernel-vanilla in general :D -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro

Re: [webapps] PHP files owner

2007-06-12 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
don't get the point in this moment... -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski jid:bluesatjabberdotgdadotpl -- If you think of MS-DOS as mono, and Windows as stereo, then Linux is Dolby Pro-Logic Surround Sound with Bass Boost

Re: SOURCES: postgresql-module-plphp-nophp_test.patch - updated for 1.3.3

2007-04-20 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
],[], [have_php5=no], [$PHP_LDFLAGS]) This is pointless. Should be s/php5/php_common/. I know - it was the first thing I've checked. But it's pointless too - look at TODO and link there... I won't bother with that, I don't need it so much :) -- pozdr. Pawel Golaszewski

Re: PLD 2.0 (Ac) marked as stable

2007-04-03 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Pawel Golaszewski wrote: 2. Here should be provides+obsoletes for old names to allow smooth upgrade. [...] STLport-4.6.2-4 zostanie zastąpiony przez STLport-5.1.2-2 błąd: libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 jest wymagany przez openoffice-1.1.5-2 błąd: libstlport_gcc.so.4.6 jest

pine in utf8 ([th] mc utf8)

2007-03-30 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Tomasz Pala wrote: Can you try latest mc from Th (2007-03-09-18)?. It looks like something improved in this snapshot. mc-4.6.2-0.2007.03.09.18.2 and unfortunatelly the problem still exists. Apropos... Please, test on utf console pine Build --without distributable,

Re: pine in utf8 ([th] mc utf8)

2007-03-30 Thread Pawel Golaszewski
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007, Marcin Król wrote: BTW - maybe someone would like to mail again to pine-developers and gain license for distribution...? Of course, if the patches are ok (on my utf console it works perfect :) ). We are allowed to distribute pine with all versions of PLD with patches