Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread wrobell
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote: Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: [...] +URL: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xulrunner/ 404 not found wrobell [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 07:43:57AM +0100, wrobell wrote: On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote: Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD Log message: [...] +URL:

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Król
+URL:http://www.mozilla.org/projects/xulrunner/ 404 not found Fixed. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Król
BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread wrobell
On Mon, 2006-05-15 at 21:57 +0200, hawk wrote: Author: hawk Date: Mon May 15 19:57:52 2006 GMT Module: SPECS Tag: HEAD [...] Index: SPECS/xulrunner.spec great. so it seems that

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread wrobell
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho regards, wrobell

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Król
great. so it seems that this is the project, which galeon and epiphany should be compiled against. any comments? Both of them were incompatible with xulrunners typeahead feature. Galeon was fixed, but epiphany wasn't. And also both xulrunner specs should be reviewed/merged before using it

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Król
mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho regards, On www.mozilla.org pages projects are referred as: Mozilla Firefox Project Mozilla Thunderbird Project The SeaMonkey Project XULRunner So IMO it should be

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread wrobell
On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 18:12 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: great. so it seems that this is the project, which galeon and epiphany should be compiled against. any comments? Both of them were incompatible with xulrunners typeahead feature. Galeon was fixed, but epiphany wasn't. And also both

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Paweł Gołaszewski
On Tue, 16 May 2006, Marcin Król wrote: mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec so it should be called mozilla-xulrunner.spec, imho On www.mozilla.org pages projects are referred as: Mozilla Firefox Project Mozilla Thunderbird Project The SeaMonkey Project

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Król
what version of epiphany? Tested both HEAD and AC-branch yesterday. They both were failing at ./configure. M. ___ pld-devel-en mailing list pld-devel-en@lists.pld-linux.org http://lists.pld-linux.org/mailman/listinfo/pld-devel-en

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some merge? mozilla.spec mozilla-firefox.spec mozilla-thunderbird.spec

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Marcin Król
but the packages are still grouped, to avoid name collision or just easier to locate them. or have strict naming (php-{pecl,pear}-, perl-} They are not grouped. They are all separate packages and does not share any files/libs. And SeaMonkey for example is even not maintained by Mozilla AFAIK.

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Jakub Bogusz
On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was mozilla-xulrunner.spec already. Ooops! Which one we should kill then? Or maybe some

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Patryk Zawadzki
Dnia 17-05-2006, śro o godzinie 00:16 +0200, Jakub Bogusz napisał(a): On Tue, May 16, 2006 at 11:24:25PM +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Dnia 16-05-2006, wto o godzinie 16:48 +0100, wrobell napisał(a): On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 17:41 +0200, Marcin Król wrote: BTW, there was

Re: SPECS: xulrunner.spec (NEW) - started packaging xulrunner, spec ba...

2006-05-16 Thread Elan Ruusamäe
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 01:24, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: Agreed but I still prefer Evolution to Thunderbird ;) kmail here ;) BTW: other distros use firefox and thunderbird as package names. other distros can .. . !! -- glen ___