On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 04:57:30PM +0200, Tomasz Pala wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 20:02:48 +0900, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
>
> > If you want me to keep this commit and directory then follow up by:
> >
> > a) updating rpm macros
>
> Yes, I was considering this point. Just wondering, what would
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 20:02:48 +0900, Jan Rękorajski wrote:
> If you want me to keep this commit and directory then follow up by:
>
> a) updating rpm macros
Yes, I was considering this point. Just wondering, what would break (in
theory: nothing should) and how to perform the validation.
If you want me to keep this commit and directory then follow up by:
a) updating rpm macros
b) cleaning up packages that have libexec redefined directly in specs
FHS states this directory is optional, and I do not care at all what GNU
shamans think. This is not GNU/PLD, just PLD.
On Thu, 06 Jul
