with the upcoming release of Plone 4.3 I've been trying to declare all
dependencies of our add ons on their setup.py file.
I'm having a weird conflicting configuration actions for utility
zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator when I include zope.i18n, as it was the
case for collective.z3cform.widge
FWIW, declaring all dependencies can be frustrating for those trying to use
products still with plone 3 since plone 3 uses fake eggs.
If you already depend on Products.CMFPlone or just Plone, isn't that enough
since that already depends on those other packages?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:51 AM, H
But,
plone.api conventions, which are also accepted as our style guide, do
encourage declaring all dependencies:
https://ploneapi.readthedocs.org/en/latest/contribute/conventions.html?highlight=imports#declaring-dependencies
Best Regards,
Asko
PS. Just to be clear, the orginal issue by Hécto
On 25/03/13 11:55, Asko Soukka wrote:
By replacing with explicit s
HV> for all packages or only for this one?
I've reading a lot of opinions against the use of package="." /> lately, so maybe we have to get rid of this at some point...
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
On 25/03/13 11:56, Nathan Van Gheem wrote:
FWIW, declaring all dependencies can be frustrating for those trying to
use products still with plone 3 since plone 3 uses fake eggs.
HV> this package is for Plone >= 4.1 so that's not a problem.
If you already depend on Products.CMFPlone or just Plo
Héctor Velarde wrote:
I'm having a weird conflicting configuration actions for utility
zope.i18n.interfaces.INegotiator when I include zope.i18n, as it was
the case for collective.z3cform.widgets:
...
does anybody knows how to get rid of this?
By replacing with explicit s
https://github.co
Héctor Velarde wrote:
On 25/03/13 11:55, Asko Soukka wrote:
By replacing with explicit
s
HV> for all packages or only for this one?
Only for those packages that would like to directly depend on zope.i18n,
I think.
And, of course, you would NOT , because
that would include the utility re
2013/3/25 Asko Soukka
> Héctor Velarde wrote:
>
>> On 25/03/13 11:55, Asko Soukka wrote:
>>
>>> By replacing with explicit
>>> s
>>>
>>
>> HV> for all packages or only for this one?
>>
>
> Only for those packages that would like to directly depend on zope.i18n, I
> think.
>
> And, of course, you
Hi Juan,
please, skim through the discussion about z3c.autoinclude:
http://plone.293351.n2.nabble.com/Let-s-get-rid-of-z3c-autoinclude-td7561158.html
is already called in CMFPlone and it
makes no sense to use it outside CMFPlone. You could simply use package="Products.CMFPlone" /> instead, bu
I removed the dependency on zope.i18n for now because we needed a
release of the package; we will need to look further into this to solve
the issue.
thanks!
Héctor Velarde
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
Product-Develope
10 matches
Mail list logo