Jim Dishaw wrote:
>If I can get the new driver to build cleanly under gcc, visual studio,
>and other common windows compilers, do we want to deprecate the other
>drivers (win3 and wingcc)?
>
>
Hi Jim,
personally I do not see much need to keep _three_ essentially equivalent
drivers around: that
On 2007-04-09 12:02-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
Note, since we must configure plplotd-wxwidgets.pc in any case to give the
users access to our wxwidgets binding library, then I think it is less
complicated for the user (and consistent with the approach used for all the
rest of our bindings) to not
I'm in the midst of a major rewrite of the wingcc driver where I'm
porting the changes I made to the win3 driver into wingcc and fixing
some oddities. The goal is to have a much better windows driver for
those of us who need it and aren't using wxwidgets.
I'm trying to decide if I should submit t
