On Apr 15, 2008, at 5:25 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 01:43:05PM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Ross
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Hez,
>>> I've commited these changes with just a couple of modifications.
>>> Note
>>>
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 01:43:05PM -0400, Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Ross
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hez,
> > I've commited these changes with just a couple of modifications. Note
> > that in C source files we use C style comments like /* */ a
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 4:52 AM, Andrew Ross
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Hez,
> I've commited these changes with just a couple of modifications. Note
> that in C source files we use C style comments like /* */ and not
> C++ comments like //. Some examples of the latter have crept into the
On 2008-04-15 10:31+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
>
> I think I have now pinned down at least one ada dependency issue. If I
> edit plplot_thin.ads.cmake then run make the plplot_thin.ads file in the
> build tree is updated, but this doesn't force the ada bindings to be
> rebuilt. Gnat knows this - if y
I think I have now pinned down at least one ada dependency issue. If I
edit plplot_thin.ads.cmake then run make the plplot_thin.ads file in the
build tree is updated, but this doesn't force the ada bindings to be
rebuilt. Gnat knows this - if you attempt to rebuild the examples it
will come up wit
Hi Hez,
Thanks for pointing this one out. Sorry I've not responded sooner, but
I've been away. I suppose ideally plcont should do the same thing as
plshades. Unfortunately for historical reasons plcont and plshades take
different arguments. Since we don't know the max / min range for the
axis in
