On 2009-05-09 20:23-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
> It looks like it is a problem with 4.4.3, pdfqt works fine with 4.5.1.
Thanks!
I have modified README.release (revision 9950) in light of this information
and the other Ubuntu/64-bit information Hazen gave, and the information
Werner reported earli
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-05-09 16:23-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
>> I have Ubuntu and Qt 4.4.3. I'll try installing Qt 4.5.1 and see what
>> happens.
>
> What version of Ubuntu? Is your box 32-bit or 64 bit? It is possible that
> Andrew has the exact combination you have (once you state w
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-05-09 16:23-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
>> I have Ubuntu and Qt 4.4.3. I'll try installing Qt 4.5.1 and see what
>> happens.
>
> What version of Ubuntu? Is your box 32-bit or 64 bit? It is possible that
> Andrew has the exact combination you have (once you state w
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-05-08 23:19-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
>> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> On 2009-05-08 22:30-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>>>
Is it expected that ctest --verbose in the build tree will end with the
following message?
91% tests passed, 2 tests failed out o
On 2009-05-09 16:23-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
> I have Ubuntu and Qt 4.4.3. I'll try installing Qt 4.5.1 and see what
> happens.
What version of Ubuntu? Is your box 32-bit or 64 bit? It is possible that
Andrew has the exact combination you have (once you state what it is) and
will be able to ve
Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2009-05-08 23:19-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
>> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>> On 2009-05-08 22:30-0400 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>>>
Is it expected that ctest --verbose in the build tree will end with the
following message?
91% tests passed, 2 tests failed out o
On 2009-05-09 11:09+0100 Andrew Ross wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:01:59PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
>> P.S. I now see you actually committed a fix to pkg-config.cmake. Since my
>> changes dealt with the QT_LIBRARIES issue directly, I am wondering whether
>> we should revert your change (bec
On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 02:01:59PM -0700, Alan Irwin wrote:
> P.S. I now see you actually committed a fix to pkg-config.cmake. Since my
> changes dealt with the QT_LIBRARIES issue directly, I am wondering whether
> we should revert your change (because I am not quite sure whether that logic
> will
Hi,
Forget my idea of somehow having a very low default ctest timeout. As
far as I can tell that is 1500 seconds by default which should be
fine for
all our tests except for systems where there is something really wrong
for some/all of the tests.
I am using the downloadable sdk (which cont
