On 2010-03-06 17:51-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> Alan,
>
> I have attached a patch which may solve the problem for you
> I hope this speeds things up significantly for you! On my system,
> x17c is slightly faster with this patch and xcairo than it is with
> qtwidget.
>
> Hez
>
Timing res
On 2010-03-06 17:24-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I thought your idea was a winner, but unfortunately the evidence is against
that because the "direct" test got identical error messages except for the
process id, (I checked that thoroughly
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 10:33 PM, Alan W. Irwin
wrote:
> On 2010-01-31 16:50-0500 Hazen Babcock wrote:
>
>> Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>>
>>> So the issue must be something special about the way xcairo implements
>>> the
>>> special interactive needs of example 17 that is done extremely
>>> inefficient
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2010-03-06 13:41-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> In case I am running it correctly, and therefore there is some run-time
>>> issue for my platform, here is some additional
Hi, Hez,
On Mar 6, 2010, at 11:12 , Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> How does this sound?
Much better, thanks! The key thing, IMHO, is to make clear the
distinction between integer "input coordinates" and integer "idata
indices" (with the former exceeding the latter by one in both
dimensions).
On 2010-03-06 13:41-0500 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin
> wrote:
>> In case I am running it correctly, and therefore there is some run-time
>> issue for my platform, here is some additional data.
>>
> ...cut (this all look fine)...
>>
>> I hope you can h
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
> I have been working with xgtk_interfaceocaml in preparation for making
> this application one of the interactive tests that we run.
>
> It builds automatically and without any errors for me when BUILD_TEST=ON in
> the build tree. That good
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:09 PM, David MacMahon
wrote:
> As you all know by now, I'm working on Ruby bindings to PLplot. I am
> (still) almost ready for a first release. There's always "a few more
> things"! :-)
>
> I am currently working on plimagefr support, including pltr support.
> I have n
