On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David MacMahon
dav...@astro.berkeley.edu wrote:
Sounds (and looks!) interesting, Hez!
Is this global transform applied before, after, or instead of the pltr
type transformations?
It looks like the global transform function has the same signature as the
pltr
On 2010-04-12 09:04-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
Sounds (and looks!) interesting, Hez!
I have to agree. I urge everyone here to look at Hez's attachment to
get a feel for the possibilities allowed by this powerful new feature.
This brings up an important question we should discuss. Is it time
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:33 , Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
The global transform is applied after the pltr-type transforms,
While the signatures are the same, I'm not sure that pltr[0-2] could
be used with plstransform in a simple manner. The intent of the
function is closer to that of the mapform
On Apr 12, 2010, at 12:16 , Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I think it is time that we take advantage of that free map data
rather than
limiting ourselves to just the four map data files that are currently
accessible from PLplot. Ideally the availability of free GIS data
(along
with changes to
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:38 PM, David MacMahon
dav...@astro.berkeley.edu wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 9:33 , Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
The global transform is applied after the pltr-type transforms,
While the signatures are the same, I'm not sure that pltr[0-2] could
be used with plstransform
On 2010-04-12 13:51-0700 David MacMahon wrote:
On Apr 12, 2010, at 12:16 , Alan W. Irwin wrote:
I think it is time that we take advantage of that free map data rather than
limiting ourselves to just the four map data files that are currently
accessible from PLplot. Ideally the availability
