On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
@Hez: Because of my plwidth core changes, the OCaml bindings will
not build any more. More details below.
To others here: use -DENABLE_ocaml=OFF for the svn trunk version
until further notice.
Thank you for
Hi Alan,
On 2013-03-14 19:00, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
One issue that completely surprises me is why in the world do the
MSVC/ifort set of compilers build the test_plend executable as
if C++ code (as opposed to plain C code) is involved?
Well, as we are building a static library the device
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Andrew Ross
andrewr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 06:31:42PM -0800, Alan Irwin wrote:
Of course, we would still be stuck with integer line widths for the
pllegend, plshade, and plshades API until we changed those width
arguments to
On 2013-03-15 05:54-0400 Hezekiah M. Carty wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 11:54 PM, Alan W. Irwin
ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca wrote:
@Hez: Because of my plwidth core changes, the OCaml bindings will
not build any more. More details below.
To others here: use -DENABLE_ocaml=OFF for the svn
On 2013-03-15 16:35+0100 Arjen Markus wrote:
Hi Alan,
On 2013-03-14 19:00, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
One issue that completely surprises me is why in the world do the
MSVC/ifort set of compilers build the test_plend executable as
if C++ code (as opposed to plain C code) is involved?
Well,
