On 2017-02-13 20:24- p.d.rosenb...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have absolutely no efficiency concerns. The cpu cycles will be
totally negligible compared to the time to copy the memory. To be
honest I rarely stress about efficiency. Premature optimisation is
usually a bad thing – don't forget that th
I have absolutely no efficiency concerns. The cpu cycles will be totally
negligible compared to the time to copy the memory. To be honest I rarely
stress about efficiency. Premature optimisation is usually a bad thing – don't
forget that the compiler has the ability to totally optimise away your
On 2017-02-12 22:51-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> I plan to stick with my local instance approach for now (automatically
> constructing a PLTwoSemaphore instance and destroying it again for
> each call to my transmitBytes and receiveBytes methods), but move to
> the private object approach for effic
