Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2016 12:00 PM
> Hi Arjen:
>
> So there are really two mysteries here: (1) how did your fix (no symbols
> visible in
> libplplottcltk) not cause a bad linking issue on Wind
On 2016-02-15 07:52- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 10:01 PM
>> To: Arjen Markus
>> Cc: PLplot development list
>&g
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2016 10:01 PM
> To: Arjen Markus
> Cc: PLplot development list
> Subject: Re: [Plplot-devel] CMake-3.5.x works flawlessly on Linux so far
>
> On 20
2016 10:39 AM
>>> To: PLplot development list
>>> Subject: [Plplot-devel] CMake-3.5.x works flawlessly on Linux so far
>>>
>>> A bad efficiency regression in CMake-3.5.0-rc1 and a whole host of other
>>> 3.5 issues
>>> got fixed for CMake-3.5.0
On 2016-02-11 13:51- Arjen Markus wrote:
> Hi Alan,
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:39 AM
>> To: PLplot development list
>> Subject: [Plplot-devel
Hi Alan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan W. Irwin [mailto:ir...@beluga.phys.uvic.ca]
> Sent: Thursday, February 11, 2016 10:39 AM
> To: PLplot development list
> Subject: [Plplot-devel] CMake-3.5.x works flawlessly on Linux so far
>
> A bad efficiency regression i
A bad efficiency regression in CMake-3.5.0-rc1 and a whole host of
other 3.5 issues got fixed for CMake-3.5.0-rc2 so I decided to test that
CMake version by doing a complete comprehensive PLplot test (except
the interactive part was dropped so I wouldn't have to babysit the test).
That noninteract
