Alan W. Irwin writes:
> Well, everything did go perfectly. We now have a slick new Subversion
> repository at SourceForge that contains all the historical information
> (branches, tags, commit messages) from our frozen CVS repository. As you can
> see from my recent commits, I have already do
On 2007-03-29 19:43-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Well I just now got through all checks, and I am satisfied with the results.
> Therefore, in the next few minutes I am going to shut down CVS as I indicated
> in previous e-mail, and start the full conversion process right after.
>
> If all goes perf
On 2007-03-28 19:15-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> More tomorrow... Meanwhile, CVS is still open for business.
Well I just now got through all checks, and I am satisfied with the results.
Therefore, in the next few minutes I am going to shut down CVS as I indicated
in previous e-mail, and start the
On 2007-03-28 22:26-0500 Maurice LeBrun wrote:
> Alan W. Irwin writes:
> > Of course, I will let this list know when that shutdown has actually
> > occurred, and I also will keep this list informed if I run into problems
> > with the sanity checks that are going to delay the CVS shutdown and
> > f
Alan W. Irwin writes:
> Of course, I will let this list know when that shutdown has actually
> occurred, and I also will keep this list informed if I run into problems
> with the sanity checks that are going to delay the CVS shutdown and
> finalization of the conversion to beyond tomorrow.
A q
On 2007-03-27 17:00-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Anyhow, it's basically going well so it could be as early as tomorrow
> (Wednesday) when all my local repository checks finally pass.
I will not be able to complete the conversion today.
First, this is a big project with some of the operations taki
This morning I started working on the PLplot conversion. The process of
creating both a local CVS, local SVN dump file, and local SVN repository
from the SF CVS repository for PLplot takes about an hour. There were no
obvious errors that occurred during that process. After that my scripts do
vari
I have now completed the conversions to Subversion for lbproject, yplot, and
ssynth with no serious issues. One thing I discovered today is that the
cvs2svn script that I have used to make these conversions is quite good
about line-ending issues. An extraneous '\r' had crept into the CVS version
On 2007-03-21 00:46-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Tomorrow I plan to compare selected CVS and SVN tagged releases for
> lbproject, upload to SF, and do final checks of the SF result to complete
> the lbproject conversion to subversion.
Done. Almost all of the conversion is handled by two high-leve
On 2007-03-19 20:23-0700 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> My current goal is to get the results of cvs2cl (which collects all the
> commit messages of the original CVS repository) and svn2cl (which collects
> all the commit messages of the converted SVN repository) to match for
> lbproject (and all other pr
My current goal is to get the results of cvs2cl (which collects all the
commit messages of the original CVS repository) and svn2cl (which collects
all the commit messages of the converted SVN repository) to match for
lbproject (and all other projects I will be converting after lbproject).
However,
This is a status report about the conversion to subversion project.
Currently I am working on converting lbproject to gain some experience. I
will continue with other small projects before finally tackling the plplot
conversion.
* Identified binary files (lbproject has some gif files in the
CVS
On 2007-02-09 19:28-0800 Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> On 2007-02-09 21:26-0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>>
>>> Now we have yet to make the decision about the timing of the next
>>> development release, 5.7.3, but I assume it will be something like
On 2007-02-09 21:26-0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
>
>> Now we have yet to make the decision about the timing of the next
>> development release, 5.7.3, but I assume it will be something like 1-2
>> months from now. IMPORTANT. Is that sort of ti
On Feb 7, 2007, at 6:18 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote:
> Now we have yet to make the decision about the timing of the next
> development release, 5.7.3, but I assume it will be something like 1-2
> months from now. IMPORTANT. Is that sort of time scale for when the
> conversion occurs OK with everybod
I am now a subversion convert.
This happened because I recently started using subversion on a regular basis
as part of the libLasi project (sf.net/projects/lasi), and I have liked it
so much in comparison to CVS that I have changed my mind about waiting until
later and now support Werner's idea th
Hi Alan,
> Is this long "import" process the step that takes so long in the official
> SourceForge process? They mention 24-hours or more to complete the task.
Not really, I mean the svn import file is about 250Mb(!!) and it needs
some time to import it, but will need maybe 15 minutes or so. Bu
Hi Werner. Thanks for creating the conversion cookbook.
On 2007-01-13 00:19+0100 Werner Smekal wrote:
> I ran through the source forge documentation about the cvs to svn
> conversions and I tested practically all steps. I made a copy of the
> whole repository, converted it, and uploaded it to my
Hi,
I ran through the source forge documentation about the cvs to svn
conversions and I tested practically all steps. I made a copy of the
whole repository, converted it, and uploaded it to my server, but
stopped the import since it just took too long (it finished 256
revisions of 7586) - you
19 matches
Mail list logo
