Re: [Plplot-devel] Looking into problem with Ada example 19

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
> Attached is a zip file with three short Ada files in it. They have a > similar structure to the problematic example 19 but do not call or link > to any PLplot stuff (despite the names of some things looking PLplot-y). > > Alan (or someone else with a 64-bit Ada compiler), if you would, please

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi, > I suspect the leading underscore on all the names is the issue. Do you have > a Fortran compiler option you can use to get rid of the leading underscores? Don't know, but will have a look. > > Also for the next iteration can you please use "make VERBOSE=1" to get the > full build commands

Re: [Plplot-devel] Recent FindGDI32.cmake changes need to be tested for BORLAND case

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi Alan, sorry that it took me such a long time to test this, but in the moment it doesn't even work for mingw anymore. The problem is, that we're looking for the gdi32 and comdlg library. These are system libraries and are found in c:\windows\system32 as .dll. MinGW can link to dll files, but not

Re: [Plplot-devel] Recent FindGDI32.cmake changes need to be tested for BORLAND case

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
Hi, I sent the mail above to Alan yesterday and resent it to the list a minute ago. I actually found a solution for this problem. Looking in the Cmake mail archives I found discussions about that topic, but no nice solution. It was suggested to link to system libraries directly (target_link_li

Re: [Plplot-devel] [Plplot-cvs] SF.net SVN: plplot:[8731] trunk/CMakeLists.txt

2008-08-31 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-31 12:25- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Revision: 8731 > http://plplot.svn.sourceforge.net/plplot/?rev=8731&view=rev > Author: smekal > Date: 2008-08-31 12:25:36 + (Sun, 31 Aug 2008) > > Log Message: > --- > For the MinGW compiler the MINGWLIBPATH variable is

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-08-31 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-31 10:25+0200 Werner Smekal wrote: > Hi, > >> I suspect the leading underscore on all the names is the issue. Do you >> have >> a Fortran compiler option you can use to get rid of the leading >> underscores? > > Don't know, but will have a look. >> >> Also for the next iteration can

Re: [Plplot-devel] [Plplot-cvs] SF.net SVN: plplot:[8731] trunk/CMakeLists.txt

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
> Hi Werner: > > I do have one minor stylistic concern about the above change. Just to be > consistent with most of the other configuration setup we do, shouldn't this > change go in cmake/modules/plplot.cmake? > > Alan Hi Alan, I put it there, since some lines below we have some settings spec

Re: [Plplot-devel] Looking into problem with Ada example 19

2008-08-31 Thread Jerry
My posting of this problem at comp.lang.ada has produced some rather arcane discussion. There is one school of thought that says that my example, being all Ada, is different than the real code (in PLplot) because plmap in my posted example is in Ada where in the real situation it is in C. T

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
Could you send the nm output for libplplotf77cd as well? That library defines plsetopt7, but it may have the wrong underscoring convention or there may be some import/export of symbols problem. That library is mentioned in your detailed linking command above. Is the choice of library name and s

Re: [Plplot-devel] [Plplot-cvs] SF.net SVN: plplot:[8731] trunk/CMakeLists.txt

2008-08-31 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-31 22:57+0200 Werner Smekal wrote: >> Hi Werner: >> >> I do have one minor stylistic concern about the above change. Just to be >> consistent with most of the other configuration setup we do, shouldn't >> this >> change go in cmake/modules/plplot.cmake? >> >> Alan > > Hi Alan, > > I

Re: [Plplot-devel] Looking into problem with Ada example 19

2008-08-31 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-31 14:14-0700 Jerry wrote: > My posting of this problem at comp.lang.ada has produced some rather arcane > discussion. > > There is one school of thought that says that my example, being all Ada, is > different than the real code (in PLplot) because plmap in my posted example > is in

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-08-31 Thread Werner Smekal
> Could you send the nm output for libplplotf77cd as well? That library > defines plsetopt7, but it may have the wrong underscoring convention or > there may be some import/export of symbols problem. That library is > mentioned in your detailed linking command above. Is the choice of library > n

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-08-31 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-09-01 00:22+0200 Werner Smekal wrote: >> Could you send the nm output for libplplotf77cd as well? That library >> defines plsetopt7, but it may have the wrong underscoring convention or >> there may be some import/export of symbols problem. That library is >> mentioned in your detailed l

Re: [Plplot-devel] MinGW 4.3.1 fortran 77 troubles

2008-08-31 Thread Arjen Markus
> Hi Arjen, > >> Well, Fortran 95 is an (almost) strict superset of FORTRAN 77, so any >> F95 >> compiler should be able to handle F77 as well (*). >> >> The problem you encounter here most likely has to do with naming and >> calling >> conventions. I have never tried gfortran under MinGW (got g95

Re: [Plplot-devel] Looking into problem with Ada example 19

2008-08-31 Thread Jerry
On Aug 31, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Alan W. Irwin wrote: On 2008-08-31 14:14-0700 Jerry wrote: My posting of this problem at comp.lang.ada has produced some rather arcanediscussion. There is one school of thought that says that my example, being all Ada, isdifferent than the real code (in PLplo

Re: [Plplot-devel] Looking into problem with Ada example 19

2008-08-31 Thread Alan W. Irwin
On 2008-08-31 21:37-0700 Jerry wrote: > Attached is a zip file that more closely emulates the PLPlot situation, with > plmap written in C but with the callback, mapform19, written in Ada. Could a > few of you test it to see if it runs or crashes on your machines? Either way, > I'd like to repor