On May 25, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> We've put up a suggested stackoverflow ad here [...]
As it turns out, these things are running for 6 months and then
flushed -- and this happened 2 days ago... (The previous text didn't
have an indication of this, otherwise I'd wait for after the flush to
post it.
I had an active SO Account, then used the same openId to sign into
meta. Then it gave me 100 points on meta for associating the two.
I could use the points bounty to hand over some points? maybe someone
could write a couple of racket questions- I'm happy to game the system
if the q's and a's are f
2010/5/25 John Clements :
> I also got 100 reputation points. Used the same ID to create the account,
> saw this banner at the top:
>
> "You've associated your Stack Overflow Meta and Stack Overflow accounts: +100
> reputation"
>
> Was it a Google OpenID?
I have a theory.
At StackOverflow I go
On 05/25/2010 10:41 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
2010/5/25 John Clements:
I also got 100 reputation points. Used the same ID to create the account, saw
this banner at the top:
"You've associated your Stack Overflow Meta and Stack Overflow accounts: +100
reputation"
Was it a Google Open
I just added both accounts and didn't get any bonus 100 points. I
guess maybe I did it in the wrong order or maybe my stackoverflow
account was too new?
Robby
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM, John Clements
wrote:
>
> On May 25, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
>
>> On 05/25/2010 09:23 AM, J
On May 25, 2010, at 9:30 AM, Robby Findler wrote:
> I just added both accounts and didn't get any bonus 100 points. I
> guess maybe I did it in the wrong order or maybe my stackoverflow
> account was too new?
I've had 295 reputation points on stackoverflow.com for a number of months now,
so per
On May 25, 2010, at 9:26 AM, John Clements wrote:
>
> I also got 100 reputation points. Used the same ID to create the account,
> saw this banner at the top:
... which means we're up to 3 points out of 6.
John
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
__
On May 25, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 09:23 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
>> 2010/5/25 Guillaume Marceau:
>>
but since this is on *meta*stackoverflow, perhaps it requires people
with reputation there instead. (And if this is the case, then it'll
be hard
On 05/25/2010 09:23 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
2010/5/25 Guillaume Marceau:
but since this is on *meta*stackoverflow, perhaps it requires people
with reputation there instead. (And if this is the case, then it'll
be hard to get upvoted enough.)
Yes, it need reputation points on m
2010/5/25 Guillaume Marceau :
>> but since this is on *meta*stackoverflow, perhaps it requires people
>> with reputation there instead. (And if this is the case, then it'll
>> be hard to get upvoted enough.)
>
> Yes, it need reputation points on meta.
>
> I wasn't able to vote despite having 71 po
> but since this is on *meta*stackoverflow, perhaps it requires people
> with reputation there instead. (And if this is the case, then it'll
> be hard to get upvoted enough.)
Yes, it need reputation points on meta.
I wasn't able to vote despite having 71 points on stackoverflow.com
_
We've put up a suggested stackoverflow ad here
http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/31913/open-source-advertising-sidebar-1h-2010/51072#51072
The bottom line is that it needs 6 votes to be accepted. You need
some reputation points to be able to upvote answers on stackoverflow,
but since th
12 matches
Mail list logo
