Yesterday I added "Delete Doc..." in the list of Gesture, Tap, and
Button assignment.
BTW, there are still unimplemented ideas in my ToDo list.
First four will be easy to implement. I'm not sure latter ones are
neccesary or not.
0. Share single function list between Gesture, Tap, and Button.
Hello,
I've been an early adopter of Plucker Desktop and distiller 1.2 since they
were made available Well not quite. I kept the 1.1 version on my laptop
(I installed desktop on my office machine) and figured that instead of
deleting all those "manualy" created channels I could get away by
Welp,
I had a chance to work on it and remembered how to build a pdb from
scratch.
Attached are the diffs (to image.c and document.[ch]) and a tabletest
DB. It's fast, pretty acurate, (and simple). The hard part is creating the
DB, but, it sounds like Blake has a handle on that.
Christo
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002 at 02:13:01PM -0500, Eric Howd wrote:
> Say ... when will I be able to use Plucker on my new Tungsten? Any
> betas that need testing? Please let me know. Eric
Working on it. The trouble is that currently the simulator isn't quite
a proper medium to test on as the emulator is,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002, matto wrote:
> Thanks. I modified and moved the rcplint.pl to scripts dir, and made
> some changes to viewer/Makefile.
Well, you did *everything* that was necessary to turn the Makefile
into a Makefile.in file ;-)
However, I made a minor change to the distclean target, so
> >Yes. It is an installer for all the Windows components of the windows
> Package. The script is in
>
> Great. I guess if you want to add the conduit to the mix, I can send along
> my Inno script once I finish off the conduit (hopefully in a week).
Absolutely!
> Does this mean the Desktop is a
David wrote:
>I thought everything was InstallShield these days.
InstallShield can do more, but costs a lot of money. Inno Setup seems to
handle all the typical uses and is free. I'm using it for all my installs
now instead of zip files since when you build the setup, it will fetch all
the fil
Robert wrote:
>Yes. It is an installer for all the Windows components of the windows
Package. The script is in
Great. I guess if you want to add the conduit to the mix, I can send along
my Inno script once I finish off the conduit (hopefully in a week).
>It is using the tools to provide a separ
I seem to be having trouble with the -s option (I tried --extra-section
too). Perhaps this is just Windows though.
If I do python spider.py -s Localhost -P . -f localhost
it seems to run fine
If I do java -jar plucker-build-1.3exp2.jar -s Localhost -P . -f localhost
it seems to ignore the stuff
> Who currently builds the Windows stuff?
I have built the Windows package for the last little while, though it has been Dirk
who has
kindly built them before then.
> Robert are you saying that your
> Inno Setup for Plucker Desktop does everything you outlined?
Yes. It is an installer for al
> Who currently builds the Windows stuff? Robert are you saying that your
> Inno Setup for Plucker Desktop does everything you outlined? Are we saying
> that the Windows Plucker Desktop installer is using Dirk's last build?
I just installed Inno Setup and started tinkering around with th
Robert wrote:
>Dirk has a lot of sources in CVS. The things missing are the sources for
plucker-build.exe stub
>program and the Inno Setup installer script. A new Inno Setup installer
script has everything I
>think would have been in the original.
>Sounds good, perhaps just call it a full Windows
On 8 Nov 2002 at 10:05, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
>
> > ..if we have the sources lying around.
>
> That's the crux exactly. Unless someone has the source, we're stuck.
> As far as I know, nobody has actually received the source Dirk is using for
> those tools. Anyone else happen to have t
> ..if we have the sources lying around.
That's the crux exactly. Unless someone has the source, we're stuck.
As far as I know, nobody has actually received the source Dirk is using for
those tools. Anyone else happen to have the source from Dirk?
> Could you add something to the Plucker
>I think I should probably define (on that page) what a parser,
>distiller, etc. are for new users.
That would help a lot.
>Nobody's been able to locate or contact Dirk in over a year,
>including via snail mail. We're not even sure he's still alive anymore..
Does this mean you need someone to b
No, but it makes it immediately easier for everyone to test it
against prc-tools concurrently for compatibility reasons. In any case,
according to Metrowerks' higher-ups and engineers, it's never going to
happen.
It is catch-22, but the attempt here is to use a port of prc-tools for
Mac OS 10.2
Michael Nordström wrote:
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
automake, of course. Welcome to my hell.
No, we don't need anything that complex. I will create a Makefile.in
either later tonight or this weekend and send to Matto so he can take
a look; it's not complicated ;-)
> Even if CW was available on Linux it doesn't necessarily mean I would use
> it ;-)
No, but it makes it immediately easier for everyone to test it
against prc-tools concurrently for compatibility reasons. In any case,
according to Metrowerks' higher-ups and engineers, it's never going to
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> Unfortunately, until CW is either available on our platform
Even if CW was available on Linux it doesn't necessarily mean I
would use it ;-)
/Mike
___
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002, Arthur Roolfs wrote:
> That being the case, I assume that everybody is using POSE for
> debugging and stepping through code with prc-tools
POSE and sometimes my Palm V when I need to test something running
on a real device; DDD + gdb works just fine for me.
> Being able to
On Fri, Nov 08, 2002, David A. Desrosiers wrote:
> automake, of course. Welcome to my hell.
No, we don't need anything that complex. I will create a Makefile.in
either later tonight or this weekend and send to Matto so he can take
a look; it's not complicated ;-)
/Mike
___
> Being able to do the latter is really the only reason to consider CW.
Unfortunately, until CW is either available on our platform (at a
reasonable cost), or freely available on our platform (in source format), we
are limited to the tools that _are_ available to us, which means prc-tools
On Friday, November 8, 2002, at 08:02 AM, Michael Nordström wrote:
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002, Adam McDaniel wrote:
I've heard that it is possible to use Codewarrior
I've made some changes to the code earlier this year (after
suggestions from Florent Pillet) that should make it possible
to build it
> OK, but I'm sorry I don't know the "standard" way to make Makefile from
> Makefile.in.
automake, of course. Welcome to my hell.
d.
___
plucker-dev mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.rubberchicken.org/mailman/listinfo/plucker-d
Welcome back.
Michael Nordström wrote:
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002, masakazu wrote:
I make a small hand-made tool to compare sample.rcp with any lang.rcp
in viewer/langs directory.
Great work, but maybe we could change the Makefile to be a
Makefile.in? Makes it consistent with the other confi
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002, Dalibor Raduch wrote:
> have you ever thought about a copying option.
There is a copy-to-memo feature in the unstable branch. Will take a
while before it turns up in a stable version, though.
/Mike
___
plucker-dev mailing list
[E
On Mon, Nov 04, 2002, Adam McDaniel wrote:
> I've heard that it is possible to use Codewarrior
I've made some changes to the code earlier this year (after
suggestions from Florent Pillet) that should make it possible
to build it also using CW. However, it's not really "supported"
and it may break
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002, masakazu wrote:
> I make a small hand-made tool to compare sample.rcp with any lang.rcp
> in viewer/langs directory.
Great work, but maybe we could change the Makefile to be a
Makefile.in? Makes it consistent with the other config files.
Also, it would probably be a good id
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I guess this message is for David.
Ut oh =)
> I was browsing the download section of the website, specifically looking
> at what Windows downloads were available.
> I think if I was a new user, I wouldn't know what to download. I think I
I guess this message is for David.
I was browsing the download section of the website, specifically looking at
what Windows downloads were available. I think if I was a new user, I
wouldn't know what to download. I think I would have ended up downloading
the zip (which says it contains no pars
> > The problem is msword embeds loads of pseudo directives in the form of
> > (something like) and Plucker is choking on
> > these. Is this an MSword problem or a Plucker problem? Either way I
> > suspect it will have to be fixed in Plucker 8^(.
>
> That's not HTML, but it's probably MS-HTML.
31 matches
Mail list logo
