Re: [plug] Software to detect IP conflicts

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 09:11:49AM +0800, triton wrote: > Is there a software that can automatically detect IP conflicts? In addition to arpwatch, you can use arping. With its -D option, you can test for duplicate address on a local network. HTH -- $_=q:; # SHERWIN # 70;72;69;6e;74;20; 27;4a;75

Re: [plug] monitor disk usage via mrtg + snmp problem

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 11:44:44AM +1100, Linux Cook wrote: > > ERROR: Target[kontor.root][_IN_] 'dskPercent. $target->[6]{$mode} ' (eval): > Bareword "dskPercent" not allowed while "strict subs" in use at (eval 15) > line 1. > > ERROR: Target[kontor.root][_OUT_] 'dskPercent. $target->[6]{$mode}

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

thanks for you inputs Ken, IAN :D On 12/13/06, Mhac Janapin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks Kenneth. :) On 12/12/06, Kenneth P. Oncinian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I was interested about your suggestion in using DISCARD, rather than >

Re: [plug] Block image attachments using Postfix

Hi sir. for postfix 2+, mime_header_checks is the preferred way. ithink. ^_^ but that will be in effect for all ur users. If you want something more selective, like perhaps on instances when a legit mail with gif attachment is always or consistently bound for one of your users, you can use your l

Re: [plug] Block image attachments using Postfix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jun, > Hi, I usually notice a lot of UCE/spam emails coming with image attachments. > It seems that it is still passing through our mailserver even after adding a > "gif" entry. Can someone point-out what's wrong with the header_checks I'm > curren

[plug] Block image attachments using Postfix

Hi, I usually notice a lot of UCE/spam emails coming with image attachments. It seems that it is still passing through our mailserver even after adding a "gif" entry. Can someone point-out what's wrong with the header_checks I'm currently using as shown below? /^((Content-(Disposition: attachmen

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

Thanks Kenneth. :) On 12/12/06, Kenneth P. Oncinian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I was interested about your suggestion in using DISCARD, rather than > REJECT. :-) I am using REJECT all the time. How does this help us > lighten email traffic? DISC

Re: [plug] Software to detect IP conflicts

Thanks again! On 12/13/06, Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: that's the way to do it. all you need to do is to create a script to automate the task for you. you might also want to try similar applications such as those arp/ip spoof monitoring tools. no, it's not crazy. it's just a way of

[plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

Dean Michael Berris wrote: Message: 8 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 18:42:00 +0800 From: "Dean Michael Berris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Co

Re: [plug] Communism and the GPL

I like it too... Neat... :) Tata Dano wrote: It's a nice contribution...i like it. On 12/12/06, *manny* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Communism and the GPL http://www.bcgreen.com/comments/2005/communism.html People run around screaming "Communist" like it's

[plug] monitor disk usage via mrtg + snmp problem

hi! Im trying to monitor my disk usage via mrtg. I think i have the correct configuration... I loaded mib UCD-SNMP-MIB.txt on my mrtg config and i can snmpwalk dskPercent.1 but im getting some errors running mrtg /etc/servername/mrtg.cfg below: ERROR: Target[kontor.root][_IN_] 'dskPercent. $ta

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I was interested about your suggestion in using DISCARD, rather than > REJECT. :-) I am using REJECT all the time. How does this help us > lighten email traffic? DISCARD will silently drop mails that will match your rules. While REJECT (or BOUNCE)

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

Hi Peter, I was interested about your suggestion in using DISCARD, rather than REJECT. :-) I am using REJECT all the time. How does this help us lighten email traffic? Would ERROR also be advisable? Thanks! -- Mhac Janapin PBTS SysAd = http://mulingsilang.blogspot.com = I

Re: C-C-C-COMBO THREAD!!! (was Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers)

-Original Message- From: "Zak B. Elep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm tired of this passionate intellectual fapping poisoning this list > though, so let me take this opportunity to express my support of the > creation of the `PLUG.politics.5769' binary newsgroup, where fappers > can post their

Re: C-C-C-COMBO THREAD!!! (was Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers)

Hello LinuxLand in the Philippines! Let me bring tidings of Joy and Peace... I have heard sharp intellectual arguments pro/con FOSS bill. I myself had my share in it. I'm happy that we have people ready to tackle sticky issues and face it head on. :-) However, I would like to suggest here to ke

Re: [plug] Communism and the GPL

On 12/12/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Communism and the GPL http://www.bcgreen.com/comments/2005/communism.html People run around screaming "Communist" like it's a threat to democracy. It's really not. Among other things, Soviet Russia suffered under Stalinism, not communism. True commu

Re: [plug] Software to detect IP conflicts

that's the way to do it. all you need to do is to create a script to automate the task for you. you might also want to try similar applications such as those arp/ip spoof monitoring tools. no, it's not crazy. it's just a way of raising your own bar :) On 12/11/06, triton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: C-C-C-COMBO THREAD!!! (was Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers)

On 12/12/06, Zak B. Elep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/12/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > FOSS can be considered more transparent than non-FOSS, even if the > non-FOSS solution's code is available to the government. Being FOSS > does not define transparency -- just like c

Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers

On 12 Dec 2006 14:00:16 +, Ciaran O'Riordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dean, You now say: > THE FOSS BILL IS A TECHNOLOGY ISSUE!!! My bad, missing a question mark somewhere there, or a NOT between "IS A". But a few days ago, when I explained how it is not about technology. I said:

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

On 12/12/06, Josel Joaquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken, Viewing the maillog file, I don't see header checking logs. I can see that the messages were being queue and processed although I tried to send message with the subject thats in my header check file. Lan, Attached is the header_checks

Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

On 12/12/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's not absurd that any GPLed Hello World program can be turned into anything your imagination and capabilites can allow. Unless you haven't done it before... FWIW the Linux kernel began as Linus' attempt to print As and Bs on the scr

Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers

On 12 Dec 2006 14:00:16 +, Ciaran O'Riordan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I didn't want to add further to this long thread, but this looks like a contradiction and could lead people to repeat themselves when replying to you, which will be boring for some. The fact that this bill has the nickna

C-C-C-COMBO THREAD!!! (was Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers)

On 12/12/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Okay Manny, now you've made it personal. On 12/12/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Dean Michael Berris wrote: > > I'm against the darned FOSS bill. But I continue to write FOSS, use > > FOSS, and advocate FOSS.

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

You dont need to run postmap on your header_checks file... just make sure you reload postfix when you change the header_checks file. Also, consider using the DISCARD keyword instead of REJECT so that you dont add email traffic and confirm your email accounts On 12/12/06, Josel Joaquin <[EMAIL PR

Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers

Dean, You now say: > THE FOSS BILL IS A TECHNOLOGY ISSUE!!! But a few days ago, when I explained how it is not about technology. I said: > This is not about software technology, this is about software procurement > policy. and you replied: > Agreed. I didn't want to add further to this

Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers

Hi Joebert, On 12/12/06, joebert jacaba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just require RFPs to -contain no brand names -no specific certification -source code available for scrutiny -interoperates with other platforms -open formats -bug fixes can be introduced by a third party -API available and well

Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

On 12/12/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/9/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> That's bad because other NON-FOSS solutions which may already solve >> the problems which the above code will have to be modified still to >> solve, do not get the chance to be conside

Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

On 12/12/06, Orlando Andico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i am sure Dean and many others think the way they do because they've written some neat app on top of a Free stack and the heck they don't want their work to be "infected" with the viral GPL. he would find a ready and willing ally in Microsof

Re: [plug] Calling out all media men and/or bloggers

Okay Manny, now you've made it personal. On 12/12/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 9 Dec 2006, Dean Michael Berris wrote: > I'm against the darned FOSS bill. But I continue to write FOSS, use > FOSS, and advocate FOSS. I just don't want FOSS to cheat its way into > government via th

Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

On 12/12/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FOSS ain't freedom? Man, that's hilarious! FOSS is not freedom. Free Software is freedom. this is why Stallman and many others hate the FOSS monicker. because people with vested interests can hijack it with semantics like "FOSS is not freedom." i

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

Ken, Viewing the maillog file, I don't see header checking logs. I can see that the messages were being queue and processed although I tried to send message with the subject thats in my header check file. Lan, Attached is the header_checks file am using on the server. Thanks for your help. On

Re: [plug] DVD-writing and the screensaver

On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 16:53:40 +0800, "Rage Callao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/12/06, Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I've written some DVDs, with the screensaver kicking >> in sometime during the burning process, and the DVDs >> seem to be readable, but I'm not *really*

Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

On 12/9/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: That's bad because other NON-FOSS solutions which may already solve the problems which the above code will have to be modified still to solve, do not get the chance to be considered by the government because there's always this piece of

Re: [plug] Re: Response to Federico Pascual

On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Rogelio Serrano wrote: On 12/9/06, Dean Michael Berris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: FOSS is NOT FREEDOM. Really? I can do wahetever i want with it except monopolise it. How is that not free? TOUCHE'! How anyone who is familiar with FOSS can think that it is not about fr

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

On 12/12/06, Josel Joaquin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/maps/header_checks, line 79: record is in "key: value" format; is this an alias file? postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/maps/header_checks.db: duplicate entry: "/^x-mailer:" What are the contents of /etc/postfix/

Re: [plug] DVD-writing and the screensaver

On 12/12/06, Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When writing an 8x DVD using the GUI DVD-writing program on Linux, which I believe uses the cdrecord program underneath, which is a painstakingly slw process, if the screensaver kicks in, is the resulting DVD corrupted in any way? I've

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Josel, Since header checks are usually global, just sending yourself an email which will trigger your rules will suffice. hth, Kenneth - -- Information Systems Division - Administration Department - -- PGP Public Key: http://m.1asphost.com/konc

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

Thanks Ken, How do i test it? Do you have a tool or is there a command to check it? Thanks again. On 12/12/06, Kenneth P. Oncinian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Josel, No, it doesnt mean that your setup is not working properly since postfix trea

Re: [plug] Postfix Header Checks

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Josel, No, it doesnt mean that your setup is not working properly since postfix treats the word "warning" literally. Are you using regular expression table for your header checks? Afaik, if your header_checks is a regular expression table, you dont

Re: [plug] DVD-writing and the screensaver

On 12/12/06, ramfree17 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:06:14 -0800 (PST), Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When writing an 8x DVD using the GUI DVD-writing > program on Linux, which I believe uses the cdrecord > program underneath, which is a painstakingly slw

[plug] Postfix Header Checks

Enabled Header cheking on our postfix relay server, however when i do postmap header_checks i get this warning messages, see sample message below; postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/maps/header_checks, line 79: record is in "key: value" format; is this an alias file? postmap: warning: /etc/postfix/ma

Re: [plug] DVD-writing and the screensaver

On 12/12/06, Pablo Manalastas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When writing an 8x DVD using the GUI DVD-writing program on Linux, which I believe uses the cdrecord program underneath, which is a painstakingly slw process, if the screensaver kicks in, is the resulting DVD corrupted in any way? If

Re: [plug] Communism and the GPL

It's a nice contribution...i like it. On 12/12/06, manny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Communism and the GPL http://www.bcgreen.com/comments/2005/communism.html People run around screaming "Communist" like it's a threat to democracy. It's really not. Among other things, Soviet Russia suffered und