On 6/6/07, Ambrosio Berdijo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
... the best wants to work for google, nobody wants to work for microsoft.
actually, if you've attended their last conference, you'll hear something
like this: "the best will start their own company and [might] sell it to the
big
I think this topic would be a great birds-of-the-same-feather discussion in the
next
local open source conference..
--
Rants aside, I think we have forgotten why people got into open source in the
first place...first of all there has to be the PASSION, here is a recent
example:
How did Bram C
On 06 6, 07, at 9:03 PM, jumbz tayamen wrote:
> The key to any (profitable) technology business is propietorship. You
> develop and (solely) market a specific technology, even if you have to
> carve your own niche market. That is profitable.
>
No it isn't. several billion dollars worth industry c
On 6/6/07, Rogelio Serrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But thats only the lucky few. What we need is an infrastructure for
research and discovery. Thats where the government can help. Venture
capital maybe but then its catch 22 again. No market no venture
capital.
perhaps what yo
On 6/6/07, Miguel Paraz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
.
For veterans, due to economic concerns (which we've discussed here in
PLUG), Pinoys with the skills don't have the spare time to hack on fun
stuff like Python/QT, even if it may become productive in the future.
Or, if they do have some fre
On 6/6/07, jumbz tayamen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you are correct, no roads = no cars. but people need to move so they
> used horses, and here in the philippines they used carabaos. So when
> there are no roads and you cannot sell cars, sell horses and carabaos;
> or sell sturdy sandals becaus
The key to any (profitable) technology business is propietorship. You
develop and (solely) market a specific technology, even if you have to
carve your own niche market. That is profitable.
The key to sustaining profitability is constant development, research
and constant development. Now, if your
For a pictorial evidence, check my blog:
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-0OCENX4haau1oA38TsiK4DP2YLk-?cq=1&p=58
Fedora development branch (Rawhide) is not really that unstable, and I believe
it is just as stable as Debian SID/Lenny, which I am also running. He he he . .
.
Fedora Rawhide, howeve
On 6/6/07, Jerome S. Gotangco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ariz Jacinto wrote:
> > we also had this kind of conversation days ago but with a different
> > focus which is,
> >
> > "is the local pool of F/OSS manpower sustainable?"
>
> We seem to be
At the risk of another language war, I think that people just do not
see how much industry demands for skilled Java developers, both
locally and internationally. I have been advocating Java (in addition
to other technologies but more on Java, of course!) and almost always
attacked by those
i have may /var/qmail/control/locals empty. but i have my fqdn of hte
host in /var/qmail/control/me, fqdn host & domain in rcpthosts. this
is a working smtp server.
hth.
--edel
On 6/5/07, Nelson Serafica <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi to all, I encountered this error for the first time. I can
On 6/6/07, Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we also had this kind of conversation days ago but with a different focus
> which is,
>
> "is the local pool of F/OSS manpower sustainable?"
>
>
> we do have PLUG, pOSitive (http://positive.ph/ ), schools with integrated
> F/OSS
> curriculum, Tra
On 6/5/07, Rogelio Serrano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The truth is, its not a sustainable business.
>
> The only way to sustain open source
>
> --
> Lay low and nourish in obscurity
>
sorry about that. I thought i discarded that snippet. I sent it by mistake.
--
Lay low and nourish in obscurit
On 6/5/07, Ariz Jacinto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for example, if we're going to look for a Qt developer, we only have 2
> places to
> look for. then if we're going to look for a Python developer, we only know 3
>
> persons who can really code using the said language. How about (and the
> l
"Jerome S. Gotangco" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ariz Jacinto wrote:
>> we also had this kind of conversation days ago but with a different
>> focus which is,
>>
>> "is the local pool of F/OSS manpower sustainable?"
>
> We seem to be doing well at the Java front, although there is still
> short
15 matches
Mail list logo
