2009/6/30 Sonny T. Cruz :
> Hi Guys,
>
> Please help me again,
>
> Monitoring Server: IP Address - 203.176.XXX.130 (PUBLIC PLDT IP ADD)
> WEB Server: IP Address - 203.177.XXX.12 (PUBLIC GLOBE IP)
> Local IP Address - 192.168.x.207
> Mail Server : IP Address - 203.172.XXX.135 (PUBLIC PLDT I
,
Sonnyboy
- Original Message -
From: Alec Joseph Rivera
To: Sonny T. Cruz ; Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion
List
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 8:56 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] Routing
Dude command output... Yung monitoring server kahit hindi nya kane
Dude command output... Yung monitoring server kahit hindi nya kanetwork
locally yung mail server, eh dapat kita nya parin by public IP
(203.172.XXX.135).
Or yung monitoring agent kita rin dapat yung monitoring server by
203.176.XXX.130. Question: bakit nakaroute yung traffic from mail to another
se
Can you make an illustration by using pipes and dashes to make it
easier to understand?
>From what I gather is that both Mail and Web servers have two NICs
each, one for the public internet and one for your LAN.
Why not add another interface (to connect to your LAN) on your
Monitoring Server? If t
Hi Guys,
Please help me again,
Monitoring Server: IP Address - 203.176.XXX.130 (PUBLIC PLDT IP ADD)
WEB Server: IP Address - 203.177.XXX.12 (PUBLIC GLOBE IP)
Local IP Address - 192.168.x.207
Mail Server : IP Address - 203.172.XXX.135 (PUBLIC PLDT IP ADD)
Local IP Add
Hi Guys,
Please help me again,
Monitoring Server: IP Address - 203.176.XXX.130 (PUBLIC PLDT IP ADD)
WEB Server: IP Address - 203.177.XXX.12 (PUBLIC GLOBE IP)
Local IP Address - 192.168.x.207
Mail Server : IP Address - 203.172.XXX.135 (PUBLIC PLDT IP ADD)
Local IP Address - 192.1
you can try pao's idea. :)
On 3/14/08, pao p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, if you are using linux, you can use iptables
> CONNMARK/MARK for marking packets so when that packets
> come from that interface it will go out where it was
> marked.
>
> I had that kind of situation before, using dif
Yes, if you are using linux, you can use iptables
CONNMARK/MARK for marking packets so when that packets
come from that interface it will go out where it was
marked.
I had that kind of situation before, using different
kinds of iptables and iproute2 will do the trick.
--- "Norbert P. Copones" <[
though not a linux solution. it can be done on openbsd
sysctl net.inet.ip.multipath=1
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq6.html#Multipath
cheers!
>On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 1:35 PM, Nelson Serafica
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>I have client that will changing provider as I stated in my
Hi!
i think you'd be better off asking this question to cisco forum/mailing
list. I read this type of problem was answered in cisco mailing of
ittoolbox.com Sorry, i forgot the answer but i think you will need the ISP's
help to solve this problem.
just my suggestion.
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at
ent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:51 PM
> To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [plug] routing two gateway
>
> On 3/11/08, Van Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Use PBR for t
f Of Nelson Serafica
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:35 PM
> To: plug@lists.linux.org.ph
> Subject: [plug] routing two gateway
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have client that will changing provider as I stated in my previous
email.
> Right now, this server has two ip and two g
Serafica
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:35 PM
> To: plug@lists.linux.org.ph
> Subject: [plug] routing two gateway
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have client that will changing provider as I stated in my previous email.
> Right now, this server has two ip and two gateway. 1 from t
Use PBR for this. What router and routing protocol are you using?
BR/Van
_
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nelson Serafica
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 1:35 PM
To: plug@lists.linux.org.ph
Subject: [plug] routing two gateway
I have client that
I have client that will changing provider as I stated in my previous email.
Right now, this server has two ip and two gateway. 1 from telcoA and 1 from
telcoB (new provider). Right now, primary gateway which is metric 0 is gw of
telcoA and telcoB is the secondary as metric 1. This has a running
- Original Message -
From: "Linux Win" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List"
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 3:18 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] routing packets
what im talking here is my linux box acting as my
Okay, to clarify:HTTP and POP : eth0SMTP: eth1I think, Roger's suggestion is in line. When you bind Apache to eth0, all HTTP connections will be accepted via eth0. You can also block port 80 on eth1 to add redundancy.
Then in your MTA's config, let your incoming POP listen on eth0 and SMTP on eth1.
yes, this is possible... enabling forwarding will do the trick... I have
implemented that same setup.. unfortunately my current needs cant be handled
by that setup...
read on iptables.. i have a PDF on iptables... if you want I can send it to
you..
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 16:46, Linux Win wrote
can you give us a diagram to have a clearer picture on our side?fooler.
This is exactly what I am after.-- Mhac JanapinPBTS SysAd=http://mulingsilang.blogspot.com=I'm an Open Source Enthusiast. c",)
Mozilla Firefox 1 - getfirefox.comMozilla Thunderbird 1 - mozilla.orgOpenOff
- Original Message -
From: Mhac Janapin
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 2:39 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] routing packets
Okay, to clarify:
HTTP and POP : eth0
SMTP: eth1
I think, Roger's suggestion is in line. Whe
e Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List"
>
> Subject: Re: [plug] routing packets
> Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:48:47 +0800
>
>
> - Original Message - From: Mhac Janapin
> To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
>
now i see, the box is just a firewall. right? On the original email it mentioned IPtables, HTTP, pop.smtp so i thought its just on one box therefore binding apache to an IP on eth0 wont be the solution. There were missing infos thats why i couldnt picture the problem properly so i compared it on my
- Original Message -
From: Roger Filomeno
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 1:45 PM
Subject: Re: [plug] routing packets
he needs incoming and outgoing goes to one interface
based on the protocol he selected.
This i
? I think i didnt totally understand what he needed to do.
On 5/10/06, fooler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- Original Message -From: Roger FilomenoTo: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion ListSent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:29 AMSubject: Re: [plug] routing packe
- Original Message -
From: Roger Filomeno
To: Philippine Linux Users' Group (PLUG) Technical Discussion List
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2006 12:29 AM
Subject: Re: [plug] routing packets
IMHO
just bind your apache to IP on eth0 ^_^, same for the mail. no need to
route them
you
IMHOjust bind your apache to IP on eth0 ^_^, same for the mail. no need to route themOn 5/9/06, Linux Win <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Im using redhat + iptables with two net gateways (eth0, eth1, eth2-local).
Now, what I want is to route all incoming and outgoing http and pop packets to eth0 and smt
Im using redhat + iptables with two net gateways (eth0, eth1, eth2-local).
Now, what I want is to route all incoming and outgoing http and pop packets to
eth0 and smtp packets to eth1. Is this possible? Got any URL for this?
--
___
Check out the lat
27 matches
Mail list logo
