On Sun, Jun 06, 2010 at 11:01:15AM -0700, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 08:20:48PM -0700, Mike Connors wrote:
On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.uswrote:
A story of System Administration the *nix way:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Aaron Burt wrote:
Understandable, though, given that *nix has always been CLI, and had to
funcion well that way, and Windows and its ecosystem is new to it.
But DOS wasn't new to CLI.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
http://www.lantronix.com/device-networking/embedded-device-servers/xport-pro.html
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug
On 06/07/2010 09:27 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Aaron Burt wrote:
Understandable, though, given that *nix has always been CLI, and had to
funcion well that way, and Windows and its ecosystem is new to it.
But DOS wasn't new to CLI.
Rich
yes, but the MS-DOS
Hi Scott,
On 06/07/10 13:37, Scott Howard wrote:
Where can I find a primer on application based virtual server.
What is your application? For some applications, such as a developer
sandbox, a Xen or Virtualbox server is a good route. For specialized
purposes, BSD jails are highly efficient and
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Joe Shisei Niski wrote:
yes, but the MS-DOS command languagewas sooo limited compared to its IXen
*contemporaries - especially for scripting - that it was truly
pitiful from the beginning. The current standard MS-Win command shell
isn't much of an improvement.
Joe,
I
On 06/07/2010 02:43 PM, Rich Shepard wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Joe Shisei Niski wrote:
yes, but the MS-DOS command languagewas sooo limited compared to its IXen
*contemporaries - especially for scripting - that it was truly
pitiful from the beginning. The current standard MS-Win command
Rich Shepard wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Joe Shisei Niski wrote:
yes, but the MS-DOS command languagewas sooo limited compared to its IXen
*contemporaries - especially for scripting - that it was truly
pitiful from the beginning. The current standard MS-Win command shell
isn't much of an
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 04:37:00PM -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
Where can I find a primer on application based virtual server.
That's quite a mouthful. Can you describe what you mean by that?
You might be talking about linux-vserver, which, like BSD's jails,
isolates applications from each other
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, Joe Shisei Niski wrote:
Would that be the good 'ol MKS Toolkit from Mortice Kern Systems?
Yes. I used it from the mid-1980s until mid-1997 when I switched
completely to linux.
Rich
___
PLUG mailing list
PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org
Oh man, flash back. MKS was cool, when all you had was Windows and needed a
real shell.
- Original Message -
From: Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com
To: General Linux/UNIX discussion and help; civil and on-topic
plug@lists.pdxlinux.org
Sent: Monday, June 7, 2010 4:21:47 PM GMT
Thank you for the responses. A friend back east is about to go live with many
users accessing a virtual server. This cuts down on cost and keeps maintanance
centralized.
My image is that my windows user would each have a sandbox? From where they
would run their programs. Yes this would
12 matches
Mail list logo
