[PLUG] CentOS subversion upgrade

2011-05-07 Thread Galen Seitz
I'm about to upgrade a CentOS server from 5.5 to 5.6. This will cause subversion to go from 1.4.2 to 1.6.11. Has anyone encountered problems with this? We use trac and subversion heavily, so I'd like to avoid a situation where I have to spend the rest of the weekend getting things

[PLUG] Cathode Ray Tubes

2011-05-07 Thread Keith Lofstrom
On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 03:12:24PM -0700, Keith Lofstrom wrote: I fervently agree with the 4:3 minority, but there are many who agree with the screen marketing departments instead. The reason On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 09:12:08PM -0600, Bill Thoen wrote: Sometimes I wonder how different

Re: [PLUG] CentOS subversion upgrade

2011-05-07 Thread Joe Shisei Niski
On 05/07/2011 10:31 AM, Galen Seitz wrote: I'm about to upgrade a CentOS server from 5.5 to 5.6. This will cause subversion to go from 1.4.2 to 1.6.11. Has anyone encountered problems with this? We use trac and subversion heavily, so I'd like to avoid a situation where I have to spend the

[PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Rich Shepard
Can anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival purposes, not printing at high resolution. TIA, Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Michael Rasmussen
On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote: Can anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival purposes, not printing at high resolution. HP Multifunction printers do up to 8.5x11. -- Michael

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Pete Lancashire
largest size ? -pete On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Michael Rasmussen mich...@jamhome.us wrote: On Sat, May 07, 2011 at 12:20:44PM -0700, Rich Shepard wrote:    Can anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Russell Senior
Rich == Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com writes: RichCan anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic Rich prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival Rich purposes, not printing at high resolution. Define fortune. -- Russell Senior, President

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Pete Lancashire wrote: largest size ? 4x6? 5x7? Standard drug-store prints and a few old Polaroids. Rich ___ PLUG mailing list PLUG@lists.pdxlinux.org http://lists.pdxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Rich Shepard wrote: Can anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival purposes, not printing at high resolution. Perhaps I'm asking the wrong question. Instead, let me try asking what I should

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Russell Senior
Rich == Rich Shepard rshep...@appl-ecosys.com writes: Rich On Sat, 7 May 2011, Rich Shepard wrote: Can anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival purposes, not printing at high resolution. RichPerhaps I'm asking

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Ken Stephens
Russell Senior wrote: Rich == Rich Shepardrshep...@appl-ecosys.com writes: Rich On Sat, 7 May 2011, Rich Shepard wrote: Can anyone here recommend a scanner for color photographic prints that doesn't cost a fortune? This would be for archival purposes, not printing at

Re: [PLUG] Scanner For Color Photographs?

2011-05-07 Thread Rich Shepard
On Sat, 7 May 2011, Ken Stephens wrote: In Xsane select Color, Full color range. The 5200C is a good scanner. I had one until it died. Ken, That's what I did. The preview and scan looked like a solarized print. I'll try something other than the Polaroids and see what happens, because I